06.03.2013 Views

(PHCII) - MMH/MMS

(PHCII) - MMH/MMS

(PHCII) - MMH/MMS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 12: Relationship between age and place of delivery (n = 400)<br />

Place of delivery Total<br />

Age in years Health unit Home n<br />

16 - 24 58 (51.33%) 55 (48.67%) 113 (100%)<br />

25-35 91 (45.05%) 111 (54.95%) 202 (100%)<br />

36-49 43 (50.59%) 42 (49.41%) 85 (100%)<br />

Total 192 (48%) 208 (52%) 400 (100%)<br />

The table shows that women aged between 25 - 35 years, majority 111(54.95%) had their<br />

deliveries at home and women aged between 36 - 49 42(49.45%) had their deliveries at<br />

home also, while women aged 16 - 24 years 58(51.33%) had their confinement in<br />

hospital. This indicates that age influences place of delivery, as the older the woman<br />

becomes the higher the chances of delivering at home.<br />

Table 13: Reasons given by mothers who had home delivery (n = 208)<br />

Reasons Number of respondents<br />

Sudden onset of labour 106 (50.96%)<br />

Clients preference 48 (23.08%)<br />

No health unit around (distance) 12 (5.77%)<br />

High costs 11 (5.29%)<br />

Presence of other attendants e.g TBAs, relatives 8 (3.85%)<br />

Others 23 (11.06%)<br />

Total 208 (100%)<br />

The above table shows that more than a half 106 (50.96%) of mothers who had home<br />

delivery had a sudden onset of labour, whereas 48(23.08%) preferred themselves to<br />

deliver at home. This indicates that these women who had sudden onset of labour could<br />

also be due to low knowledge on signs and symptoms of labour.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!