mmpc - National Indian Health Board
mmpc - National Indian Health Board
mmpc - National Indian Health Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Findings<br />
Findings<br />
Payments for AIAN Medicaid Recipients<br />
The total amount of Medicaid funds paid in 2006 for 550,000 IHS AIAN Medicaid enrollees living in the service<br />
delivery Areas of IHS and tribally operated facilities for paid personal health care services was $ 2.05 billion<br />
(Table 2). The personal health care services included Medical (including physician, clinic, outpatient, laboratory<br />
and imaging, pharmacy), Behavioral <strong>Health</strong> and Dental Care services. An additional $15 million was paid by<br />
other third-party payers (mainly private insurance) to cover payments for the claims filed with Medicaid. Of<br />
those IHS AIAN Medicaid enrollees 496,000 were recipients of Medicaid paid services during the year.<br />
Findings are presented here for the CHSDA counties of the IHS service delivery areas. The numbers of IHS AIAN<br />
with Medicaid coverage in the separate states of each IHS service delivery area are not large enough to give<br />
statistically reliable findings (the numbers and payments for AIAN in the counties of the IHS service delivery<br />
areas of the states in the analytical subgroups are presented in Attachments F to I). One of the main reasons why<br />
state numbers of IHS AIAN are not large enough is that not all states report IHS claims separate from other<br />
claims (see American <strong>Indian</strong> and Alaska Native Medicaid Program and Policy Statistics: Summary Report 2009)<br />
and when they do they do not capture all claims for IHS AIAN.<br />
Recipients with Fee-for-Service Medical Services<br />
Age, Sex, Disability & Morbidity Do Not Explain Differences in Payments<br />
If left unadjusted for any determinants, the mean total payment for IHS AIAN recipients with FFS medical care<br />
who are less than 65 years of age is only slightly higher than Whites ($5,104 compared to $4,960, or $144<br />
difference), but much higher than Other AIAN ($3,670, or $1,436 difference) (Figure 1). The minimal actuarial<br />
adjustment for age and sex differences increases the difference in payments between IHS AIAN and Whites<br />
($7,052 compared to $6,369, or about $600) but not with Other AIAN ($7,052 compared to $5,567, or about<br />
$1500). This effect is expected because the IHS AIAN have a younger age distribution than that of Whites and<br />
therefore lower expected payments, but a similar age distribution to that of Other AIAN and therefore similar<br />
expected payments. The mean adjusted payment increases for all three groups with the age adjustment because<br />
payments for older more costly recipients are given equal weight with less costly younger recipients which<br />
constitute the vast majority of the recipients in all three groups. This is how the statistical adjustment controls<br />
for the differences in age distributions across the three groups.<br />
Adjusting payments further for disability status, either because of Medicaid eligibility as a disabled enrollee, or<br />
as a Medicare-Medicaid ‘Dual’ enrollee under age 65, increases the adjusted means and the differences in means<br />
for all three groups (Figure 1). The mean total payment for IHS AIAN is much higher for Whites ($9,999<br />
compared to $7,884, or a $2,115 difference) and for Other AIAN ($7,319, or a $2,680 difference). Again the<br />
adjusted mean rises for all groups because the higher payments for the smaller groups of Disabled are given<br />
equal weight with less costly but higher proportions of non-disabled recipients during the statistical<br />
adjustment.<br />
19