06.03.2013 Views

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary<br />

T<br />

he <strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Service (IHS) provides only part of the health care needed by the American <strong>Indian</strong>s and<br />

Alaska Natives (AIAN) who rely on the IHS health care system because of the limited funding<br />

appropriated to the agency by the federal budget. The largest alternate resource to IHS for the health<br />

care funding of AIAN who rely on the IHS health care system is Medicaid. Medicaid pays for care received<br />

not only at the IHS and tribally operated health care facilities, but from other providers when specialized or<br />

emergency care is needed. The federal Medicaid program pays 100% of state Medicaid claims from IHS health<br />

care system providers for IHS funded services provided to AIAN (IHS Program claims). Together with its<br />

companion program, the Children’s <strong>Health</strong> Insurance Program (CHIP), Medicaid has grown to provide a<br />

substantial but largely unknown fraction of the coverage of health care for the AIAN who use the IHS system.<br />

The first objective of this report to determine whether Medicaid (including the Medicaid portion of CHIP not<br />

operated by states alone) pays as much for the personal health care services of AIAN who rely on the IHS system<br />

of health care providers (IHS AIAN) as it does for other Medicaid recipients. If the per capita amounts paid for<br />

the IHS AIAN are comparable to those of others, then a basic measure of health care equity for AIAN served by<br />

the IHS system has been achieved. If not then efforts are needed to achieve equity.<br />

A second objective is to determine whether there are any Areas of the IHS health care delivery system, or<br />

subgroups of AIAN who rely on the IHS system that do not have Medicaid payment levels as high as those of<br />

other AIAN subgroups served by the IHS System. Where the payment levels for IHS AIAN are not as high as<br />

those of others in an Area, it can be because IHS AIAN have more difficulties obtaining Medicaid paid care, or<br />

because the state and IHS system provider need to work more closely to see that Medicaid claims are filed and<br />

paid successfully. If IHS system providers do not file and collect claims for services provided to Medicaid<br />

enrolled AIAN they serve, they are in effect substituting IHS funding for Medicaid funding of health care costs. In<br />

this report, analyzing only the Medicaid data of the counties of the IHS Areas allows comparison of payments<br />

across IHS Areas and using Medicaid data that has been linked with IHS registry data allows examination of<br />

AIAN subgroups served by the IHS System.<br />

A third objective of this report is to determine what fraction of the personal health care costs of the AIAN user<br />

population of the IHS system is actually provided by Medicaid payments. The IHS has current data on the<br />

Medicaid collections of the IHS and tribal facilities that they operate, but not the tribal facilities operated by<br />

tribes. About one-third of the IHS system facilities are tribally-operated facilities. The IHS estimates that about<br />

25% of the per capita costs of health care needed by AIAN they serve is paid by third-parties including Medicaid,<br />

Medicare and private insurance. The AIAN survey data on which this calculation is based is now more than 20<br />

years old, however. Medicaid payment data provides a way to update the Medicaid portion of the third-party<br />

payment fraction. In addition it offers a way to estimate how much this Medicaid fraction varies across IHS<br />

Areas. Determination of the fraction is critical because the IHS estimates that it provides only about 54% of the<br />

per capita costs of health care needed by AIAN they serve. The extent to which the 25% fraction is too high,<br />

underestimates the remaining unmet health care need of the AIAN, the extent to which the 25% fraction is too<br />

low overestimates the unmet health care need. The IHS allocates new federal funds it receives to the IHS and<br />

tribally-operated facilities based on its calculated estimates of the unmet health care need of the AIAN served by<br />

the facilities.<br />

To achieve the first two objectives, after excluding longterm care and institutionalized Medicaid recipients the<br />

per capita payments for six different types of Medicaid recipients of the remaining medical, behavioral health

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!