06.03.2013 Views

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Findings<br />

Percent of IHS Active Users who are Medicaid enrollees (column B). The Medicaid enrollment rate for IHS<br />

Active Users was determined during the linkage of IHS Registry data to this Medicaid enrollee data (see<br />

Methods and Table 2 in the 2011 report Integrating Medicaid and <strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Service Data).<br />

Percent of IHS Active User Medicaid Enrollees who are Recipients of Medicaid Paid Services (column C).<br />

The Medicaid participation rate of enrollees was determined by dividing the number of IHS AIAN Medicaid<br />

enrollees that had paid claims of more than zero dollars in column A, by all the IHS AIAN Medicaid<br />

enrollees (Attachment Table C.3).<br />

When expressed as a percent of the FDI Adjusted Benchmark Costs, the Areas with lowest fractions of health<br />

care costs paid by Medicaid for their IHS Active User population are Nashville (19%) and Oklahoma (21%)with<br />

a Medicaid Fraction of about one-fifth ( Figure 15). Aberdeen, California, Albuquerque, Portland and Bemidji<br />

Areas have mid-range fractions of between a little more than one quarter and a little less than one-third (27% to<br />

31%). Alaska and Billings are in the middle of the Area rankings with a little more than one-third of the costs<br />

paid by Medicaid (34% to 38%). And Navajo and Phoenix have Medicaid fractions of nearly one half (46% and<br />

49% respectively). Tucson has the highest Medicaid paid fraction of nearly two-thirds (65%).<br />

Figure 20. Medicaid Alternate Resources paid to all providers as percent of IHS calculated FDI benchmark health care costs<br />

for IHS Active Users in each Area.<br />

Nashville<br />

Oklahoma<br />

Aberdeen<br />

California<br />

Albuquerque<br />

Portland<br />

Bemidji<br />

Billings<br />

Alaska<br />

Navajo<br />

Phoenix<br />

Tucson<br />

19%<br />

21%<br />

27%<br />

29%<br />

29%<br />

30%<br />

31%<br />

34%<br />

38%<br />

46%<br />

49%<br />

Medicaid Fraction Paid to IHS and Tribal Providers for IHS Active Users<br />

Using the Medicaid IHS Program claims payment data for IHS AIAN Medicaid recipients we can calculate the<br />

expected Mean Medicaid IHS Program Payment per IHS Active User to IHS and Tribal (I/T) providers. We<br />

substitute the unadjusted Mean Medicaid IHS Program Payment per IHS AIAN Recipient for the Total Payment<br />

in the calculations in Table 14 to obtain the percents in Figure 16.<br />

When the outcomes are expressed as a percent of the FDI Adjusted Benchmark Cost, the Areas with I/T<br />

providers with the lowest reported Alternate Resources for IHS Active User Medicaid enrollees are Nashville<br />

(2%), Bemidji (4%), Oklahoma (4%) and California (6%), (Figure 15). For Portland, Albuquerque, and Aberdeen<br />

Areas only 8% of all Medicaid payments are to IHS and Tribal providers for health care costs of their Active<br />

Users, and Alaska Area is only 9%. Medicaid resources Billings (12%), Navajo (19%), Phoenix (21%), and<br />

Tucson Areas (24%) have the highest relative Medicaid resources.<br />

39<br />

65%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

Percent of FDI Benchmark Cost<br />

All Providers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!