06.03.2013 Views

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

mmpc - National Indian Health Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Findings<br />

Figure 5. Adjusted Mean Total Payment per Recipient for IHS AIAN in Figure 3 which excluded recipients in the state of<br />

Arizona divided into the 3 IHS AIAN groups in Figure 4. Other AIAN and Whites of Figure 3 are also shown.<br />

Aberdeen<br />

Alaska<br />

Albuquerque<br />

Bemidji<br />

Billings<br />

California<br />

Nashville<br />

Navajo<br />

Oklahoma<br />

Phoenix<br />

Portland<br />

Tucson<br />

$- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000<br />

In all Areas except the Nashville Area, payments for IHS Active Users who did not have any Medicaid IHS<br />

Program claims (Group 3) were lower or about the same (Alaska and Portland Areas) as those of Whites (Figure<br />

4).<br />

Payments for Outpatient Services had Largest Effect on Total Payments<br />

We investigated whether there were payments for particular types of services that explained the higher<br />

payments for IHS AIAN with IHS Program claims (Groups 1 and 2). The cleanest way to investigate this was to<br />

successively exclude 1) clinic and physician outpatient payments (Figure 6), then 2) hospital payments (Figure<br />

7), and finally 3) prescription drug payments (Figure 8). These three categories of services were uniformly<br />

defined by the Medicaid data extraction process into separate MAX claims files.<br />

Excluding outpatient clinic and physician payments (Figure 6) had the largest impact of the three general types<br />

of service on reducing the differences in mean total payments per recipient between IHS AIAN with IHS<br />

Program claims (Groups 1 and 2) and IHS AIAN Group 3 without IHS Program claims and Whites. The average<br />

decline in adjusted mean payments for Group 1 was $2,960, Group 2 was $2,520, while that for Group 3 was<br />

$680 and Whites was $750 (difference in values of Figure 6 and Figure 4). Particularly large differences remain<br />

for Groups 1 and 2 for the Areas with Arizona state recipients (Navajo, Phoenix and Tucson Areas). For hospital<br />

services the average decline in adjusted mean payments for Group 1 was $1068, Group 2 was $992, while that<br />

23<br />

1.IHS Program claims<br />

& Active User<br />

2.IHS Program claims<br />

but Not Active User<br />

3.IHS Active User with<br />

no IHS Program claims<br />

Other AIAN<br />

Whites

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!