06.03.2013 Views

buletinul institutului politehnic din iaşi - Universitatea Tehnică ...

buletinul institutului politehnic din iaşi - Universitatea Tehnică ...

buletinul institutului politehnic din iaşi - Universitatea Tehnică ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bul. Inst. Polit. Iaşi, t. LVIII (LXII), f. 4, 2012 73<br />

Fig. 1 – Schematic representation of the test rig.<br />

3. 3. Experimental Results Analyses<br />

Table 1 presents the results of the experimental test carried out without<br />

vapour injection. Each test point is characterized by the supply pressure (Psu),<br />

exhausted pressure (Pex), superheating temperature (ΔTSI) and subcooling<br />

temperature (ΔTsub).<br />

Table 2 presents the results of the experimental test carried out with<br />

vapour injection. Each test point is characterized by the supply pressure (Psu),<br />

exhausted pressure (Pex), superheating temperature (ΔTSI) and subcooling<br />

temperature (ΔTsub). Let be other types of situations.<br />

Figs. 2–8 (Zabet, 2011) present the cooling capacity (Φ0), heating<br />

capacity (Φcd), compressor power ( W ), coefficient of performance for heating<br />

&<br />

cp<br />

(COPh) and cooling (COPc), compressor exhausted temperature (tex;cp) versus<br />

pressure ratio (π) in the cases with/without injection. As can be seen from the<br />

figures, vapour injection method is better than the case without injection for<br />

pressure ratio between 5 and 7.5.<br />

For the vapour injection tests the injection mass flow rate ( inj<br />

M& ) varied<br />

from 0 to 0.027 kg/s, which corresponds to an injection ratio INJR from 0 to<br />

9.6%. The injection ratio is defined by injection mass flow rate divided by<br />

supply mass flow ratio.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!