06.03.2013 Views

buletinul institutului politehnic din iaşi - Universitatea Tehnică ...

buletinul institutului politehnic din iaşi - Universitatea Tehnică ...

buletinul institutului politehnic din iaşi - Universitatea Tehnică ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bul. Inst. Polit. Iaşi, t. LVIII (LXII), f. 4, 2012 113<br />

4. Theoretical and Experimental Investigations Results<br />

The results of theoretical and experimental investigations presented in<br />

Fig. 1-6, show good correlation between them.<br />

Supercharging pressures used are in the range of 1.4…1.8 bar.<br />

Comparative to the aspirated engine, the maximum pressure increases with<br />

almost 100 % for a supercharging pressure (ps) of 1.8 bar, Fig. 1. High value of<br />

maximum pressure leads to the limitation of supercharging pressure at 1.4 bar<br />

when the increase of maximum pressure value (~ with 50 % comparative to<br />

classic solution) is acceptable for the engine reliability.<br />

In order to avoid the knocking and to limit the maximum pressure, the<br />

ignition angle value optimization was achieved in such a way that the BSFC is<br />

maintained almost constant for different supercharging pressures (Fig. 2).<br />

For 1.4 bar supercharge pressure the increase BMEP is significant<br />

(~22%) and increase is more at much higher supercharging pressure because of<br />

the influence of ignition timing value (Fig. 3). Also from this reason the<br />

limitation of the supercharging pressure at 1.4 bar is justified.<br />

Due to combustion process improvement the level of CO and HC<br />

emissions decreased (~24% for CO and ~11% for HC) (Fig. 4 and Fig. 6). The<br />

NOx emission level decreases significant for 1.4 bar supercharging pressure<br />

(Fig. 5) fact also influenced by the reduction of spark ignition timing.<br />

Supercharging represents an efficient method of engine downsizing.<br />

Thus, in order to obtain the same power as the reference engine, the engine<br />

displacement must be reduced by 1.5 times for 1.4 supercharging pressure. This<br />

engine displacement reduction can be assured by the limitation of the engine<br />

cylinders number, which also leads to the increase of the engine mechanical<br />

efficiency. Another advantage of supercharging is the reduction of the<br />

maximum power/maximum torque speeds – downspee<strong>din</strong>g concept. Thus, the<br />

same power of 66 kW at 4800 rpm of the normal aspirated engine was obtained<br />

for supercharging at 1.4 bar at 3900 rpm, and the maximum torque of 137<br />

Nm/3600 rpm was reached at the speed of 2500 rpm. The reduction of the fuel<br />

consumption and engine wear are the main advantages of this concept.<br />

Spark ignition timing modification directly affects the combustion<br />

process variability evaluated by coefficient of variability in maximum pressure.<br />

For 4800 rpm the coefficient of variability in maximum pressure reach the value<br />

of (COV) = 6.574% for λ= 0.85 and 1.4 bar supercharging pressure.<br />

p max<br />

The influences of combustion process on engine running are reflected by<br />

the values of the coefficients of cycle variability in indicated mean effective<br />

pressure. The values of variability coefficient in IMEP are (COV)IMEP=1.986%<br />

for λ= 0.85 at ps = 1.4 bar.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!