RRNF, E-2 Inter-Forest Grazing Report - Southern Oregon Digital ...

office as follows
Undex date of April P.O, 1917, I wrote the grtor
Upqu"Supervipion Aj ril 2, 1917
Foret SupervIsor,
iiedford ,Oregon#
D1ear Ur. riokson:
'our letlor of April 18 Is recedveod
In the range allotted to th'various am
I do not find Cow Camp, Jkarasno Vupp krairie,
.one women, Ruul Lake and Colwel oamps. It -r
be that thovee hnvvbeen 1l~ted under another
name. Stipc they are all within t?* Umpqua
Porazt* 1 should be glad to know if they ae
In uee under ihat names they are nolute&* .
Wile at dRadford recently I left with you
oop]eE of all applicatioen for gra ing along the
boundary line, none of whioh T tobeiove include
rtango within the ora4tr ex,4j't thit of R1amlins,
I ehovld be verl gald If you will eond me oUpies
of the applJoations of the list inoluded in your
lotter of A-rU Th.
It ls noted that a number of your cattle
gazirig aplioatione. are lited as Close 'A" mn
who have se high at 85 head of cattle. I should
be very gl.dL to Lnorw if you have oetablished a
protectivQ limit ainoe last year. i. N Zst.
stated fn his letter of Apri1 SI, 1916 that*
"There has never bee a protootive limit astab.
lishe& for dvi'triote 8 and 1, which oomprise
that portion of the Orator Foreet along the
Umpqjua Dxijdq,,"
Our pwotective limit on this Porest Is
25 cattle an& horses, therefore thure are oxr
two men on your list, Robert Davson an Harry
Banks, who Would mome within C1lea A. As suga8steA
to you at Uae&for4, I think there should be a uni*
form ~rotoativo limit alone the bondary I$ .
betwoon the orator and Vmpqua poreets, beoause
it is oertainly not fair to 'Clasi A etookmah on
this side who have a prototive limit *f 25 as
01ligto~stjtr tn 3!5,!?J}ajn r ft 3
head is too sma11 and I think we shouad arrive
at some nuriber ard adopt it for both porests,
aSWoo upon ,I4ie at edfiord, I am praparing
a stipulation In reforeno* to handlin
inter-for8st Sarsln between the Orator anI
120