06.03.2013 Views

IMS Company Profiles - Report Buyer

IMS Company Profiles - Report Buyer

IMS Company Profiles - Report Buyer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IMS</strong> COM PANY PRO FILES NOVARTIS<br />

An a lyst Com ment<br />

Fol low ing the re lease of Q4 re sults, Cowen & Co an a lysts (Jan u ary 2009) noted that the re sults were “dis -<br />

ap point ing” but that the “out look re mains ro bust” They high lighted that Novartis re ported sig nif i cantly<br />

lower-than-ex pected EPS and lack lus ter rev e nues. They noted that the Phar ma ceu ti cal and Vac cines<br />

busi nesses dem on strated good mo men tum, in Q4, but that Sandoz and Con sumer “con tinue to face<br />

head winds.” The con cluded that they “con tinue to be lieve that NVS should de liver top-tier growth<br />

through 2015.” The analysts rated Novartis “Outperform.”<br />

Mor gan Stan ley an a lysts (Jan u ary 2009) once again rated Novartis “Over weight” and noted that Q4 rev -<br />

e nues were 2% be low their ex pec ta tions and 4% be low the con sen sus. They put this down to cur rency<br />

ef fects and the nu mer ous “one-time” items which in creased op er at ing ex penses. Con sumer Healthcare<br />

how ever, was con sid er ably lower than they had an tic i pated, and the an a lysts sug gest that this shows<br />

that the busi ness is more cy cli cal than they had previously anticipated.<br />

In June 2008, Mor gan Stan ley an a lysts re it er ated their ‘Over weight’ rat ing on Novartis fol low ing its vac -<br />

cines day, which they said, “in di cates fore casts are set to dou ble. The Novartis vac cines day con firmed<br />

that the phar ma ceu ti cal in dus try is on the cusp of con sid er able tech no log i cal break through, with three<br />

new po ten tial vac cines set to be launched ahead of 2010/11. As we high lighted in April 2008, we con tinue<br />

to be lieve that the meningococcal vac cine mar ket is set to grow from circa $1 bil lion cur rently to circa $5<br />

bil lion by 2015 (e), with Novartis set to be the dom i nant player. With up side to both rev e nues and mar gin<br />

es ti mates, con sen sus vac cines fore casts may need to dou ble un der our blue sky sce nario, thereby adding<br />

circa 5-15% to longer term EPS forecasts.”<br />

The an a lysts state that they like “Novartis’ di ver si fied healthcare busi ness model, with pharmaceuticals,<br />

vac cines, generics and con sumer health. In 2013, we es ti mate that only 45% of Novartis’ rev e nue will<br />

come from small mol e cule pharmaceuticals.” They also added that they con sider that in ves tors have<br />

failed to ap pre ci ate the sig nif i cance of Novartis’ vac cines port fo lio; they think this could add more than<br />

15% to con sen sus EPS fore casts. And they think that al though the Alcon trans ac tion came at a high price,<br />

Novartis will now have a smooth earn ings pro gres sion from 2010 to 2015, un like many of its peers. They<br />

see key value driv ers as Glivec and Tasigna in on col ogy/CML, Tekturna (which should have rev e nues of<br />

$830 mil lion in 2014, when Diovan faces ge neric com pe ti tion), non-pharma as sets, such as vac cines,<br />

generics and con sumer health) and, in par tic u lar, the vac cines busi ness (which should have rev e nues of<br />

$4 bil lion in 2013, com pared to $1.5 billion in 2007, driven by Menveo and MenB).<br />

In re ports through 2008, Mor gan Stan ley an a lysts have noted the loss in sales fol low ing 2007’s launch of<br />

ge neric ver sions of Lotrel, Trileptal, Lamisil and Famvir, and the with drawal of Zelnorm. They es ti mate<br />

that Novartis has lost around $3.2 bil lion in branded phar ma ceu ti cal rev e nues and 10% of its 2006 group<br />

rev e nues. They es ti mate this ac counts to $2.8 bil lion of gross profit. How ever, they high lighted that in<br />

2011, Novartis will en ter one of the tough est pe ri ods for any of the pharma ma jors. Be tween 2011-2015,<br />

they ex pect ge neric com pe ti tion to emerge for prod ucts that will gen er ate rev e nues of $15.6 bil lion in<br />

2010, rep re sent ing 55% of 2010 phar ma ceu ti cal rev e nues and 35% of 2010 group rev e nues. Ap prox i -<br />

mately 40% of the rev e nues ex posed to pat ent ex pi ra tions are within the US, where ge neric en trants<br />

typ i cally capture 80-90% market share during the first three months.<br />

© 2009 <strong>IMS</strong> Health In cor po rated or its af fil i ates Page 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!