The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ... The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

05.03.2013 Views

iSi THE GENUINE HISTORY OF These are the four reafons, which, '* though ** obvious/' were faid to be " new and decifive," and triumphantly boafled " to conclude the con- *' troverfy for ever,'* and " to quafh for ever *' a fyftem that has been fo long impofed for ** truth upon the world." And what have they proved upon trial ? The mere ghofts of former arguments, again introduced upon the Hage to furprize and elevate, and, like true ghofts, pretending to a greater power and au- thority on their fecond appearance, than they had in their original condition; the formations of fancy, the creations of darknefs, and actually Tcfolving themfclves into nothing at the approach of light. vni.

MR. THE BRITONS ASSERTED. 233 VIIL Macpherfon having thus laboured un- fuccefsfully in the deduction of the Bri- tifli Scots, it may be expedient for me to invefti- gate their genuine origin. And, as he has en- deavoured to make them native Caledonians, I ihall endeavour to Ihew them as they were, the tranfplanted natives of Ireland. This may now be done with fuch a decifive weight of evidence, that if Mr. Macpherfon had been apprized of it, I am convinced, he would never have written his Introduftion. And, from that evidence, the true origin and tranfa^lions of the antient Scots have already been given in the Hiftory of Manchefter. There Mr. Macpherfon's objeftions had been all virtually anfwered before they were made, and folutions given to his difficulties before they were flatted. And, as a fecond and general reply to all his difficulties and objeftions, I fhall here briefly repeat the fubflance of what I had pre- Tioufly obferved on the fubje£i:, reducing it all into one comprehenfive view, and confirming it with fome additional notices. When

MR.<br />

THE BRITONS ASSERTED. 233<br />

VIIL<br />

Macpherfon having thus laboured un-<br />

fuccefsfully in <strong>the</strong> deduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bri-<br />

tifli Scots, it may be expedient for me to invefti-<br />

gate <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>genuine</strong> origin. And, as he has en-<br />

deavoured to make <strong>the</strong>m native Caledonians, I<br />

ihall endeavour to Ihew <strong>the</strong>m as <strong>the</strong>y were, <strong>the</strong><br />

tranfplanted natives <strong>of</strong> Ireland. This may now<br />

be done with fuch a decifive weight <strong>of</strong> evidence,<br />

that if <strong>Mr</strong>. Macpherfon had been apprized <strong>of</strong> it,<br />

I am convinced, he would never have written his<br />

Introduftion. And, from that evidence, <strong>the</strong> true<br />

origin and tranfa^lions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> antient Scots have<br />

already been given in <strong>the</strong> Hiftory <strong>of</strong> Manchefter.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re <strong>Mr</strong>. Macpherfon's objeftions had been all<br />

virtually anfwered before <strong>the</strong>y were made, and<br />

folutions given to his difficulties before <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

flatted. And, as a fecond and general reply to<br />

all his difficulties and objeftions, I fhall here<br />

briefly repeat <strong>the</strong> fubflance <strong>of</strong> what I had pre-<br />

Tioufly obferved on <strong>the</strong> fubje£i:, reducing it all<br />

into one comprehenfive view, and confirming it<br />

with fome additional notices.<br />

When

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!