The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ... The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

05.03.2013 Views

•TO THE GENUINE tilSTORY 0$" lirmation of it, that one tribe of the Caledonians was aftually denominated Albanii in the days of the Romans. But, when we come to examine it more accurately, even in this light it is incompe- tent and ufelefs. The inference, that, as the Highlanders have prefervcd the antient name of the Englifh, Saffon, they have therefore much more probably preferved their own, very reafon- able as it certainly is, is dire£tly Confronted by a faft. And all inferences of reafon, on points like thefe, mufl: bow dov/n to the authority of fa6ls. The Welfli have equally retained the name of Saffon for the Englifh. And yet they have ac- tually lofl their own indigenous name of Welfli. Though this appellation, as I have previoufly Ihewn, was even borne by them as late as the lixth century, it is now lb totally loft among them, that the criticks have denied them ever to havfe borne it at all. Thus uncertain is all this fort of argumentation. And thus does the dancing meteor continually elude us, even when wc think it raoft fubftantial and folid. The whole body of the Caledonians, however, could never have been, and are not now, deno- minated Albanich. The name of Caledonia com- prizing all that large peninfula of land which lies to the North of the Friths, the appellation of Alb-an, or the mountains, could have been given only to the hilly part of the country, in oppo-

THE BRITONS ASSERTED. 271 oppofition to the levels of the eaftern coaft, and the plains immediately to the North of Antoni- nus's Vallum. The inhabitants of thefe I have al- ready (hewn to have been denominated Mzeatse, or Lowlanders, by the Britons and Romans. And the inhabitants of the hills only are denominated Albanich, or Highlanders, at prefent. The tribes of the Caledonian Lowlands were deno- minated Mseatcc formerly, in contradiflinftion to the nations of the hills. And the clans of the Caledonian mountains are denominated Albanich or Highlanders at prefent, in oppofition to th« refidents of the Lowlands. This fecond " decifive" and " conclufiv*" argument therefore, asthefecond, is no argument at all. It is only a part of the firft. And, even in itfelf, it is neither decifive nor conclufive. It pretends only to be a probable proof. And it is not even that. In every view, it has been fhewn to be grofsly defe(^ive and erroneous. P. 147—148. " Had the Scots been originally " Irifh, Eirinich and not Albanich would have " been their proper name. So far were they " from adopting the name of their neighbours of " Hibernia, that it is well khows that both the " old

•TO THE GENUINE tilSTORY 0$"<br />

lirmation <strong>of</strong> it, that one tribe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caledonians<br />

was aftually denominated Albanii in <strong>the</strong> days <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Romans. But, when we come to examine it<br />

more accurately, even in this light it is incompe-<br />

tent and ufelefs. <strong>The</strong> inference, that, as <strong>the</strong><br />

Highlanders have prefervcd <strong>the</strong> antient name <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Englifh, Saffon, <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong>refore much<br />

more probably preferved <strong>the</strong>ir own, very reafon-<br />

able as it certainly is, is dire£tly Confronted by a<br />

faft. And all inferences <strong>of</strong> reafon, on points like<br />

<strong>the</strong>fe, mufl: bow dov/n to <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> fa6ls.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Welfli have equally retained <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong><br />

Saffon for <strong>the</strong> Englifh. And yet <strong>the</strong>y have ac-<br />

tually l<strong>of</strong>l <strong>the</strong>ir own indigenous name <strong>of</strong> Welfli.<br />

Though this appellation, as I have previoufly<br />

Ihewn, was even borne by <strong>the</strong>m as late as <strong>the</strong><br />

lixth century, it is now lb totally l<strong>of</strong>t among<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, that <strong>the</strong> criticks have denied <strong>the</strong>m ever to<br />

havfe borne it at all. Thus uncertain is all this<br />

fort <strong>of</strong> argumentation. And thus does <strong>the</strong> dancing<br />

meteor continually elude us, even when wc<br />

think it ra<strong>of</strong>t fubftantial and folid.<br />

<strong>The</strong> whole body <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caledonians, however,<br />

could never have been, and are not now, deno-<br />

minated Albanich. <strong>The</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Caledonia com-<br />

prizing all that large peninfula <strong>of</strong> land which<br />

lies to <strong>the</strong> North <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Friths, <strong>the</strong> appellation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Alb-an, or <strong>the</strong> mountains, could have been<br />

given only to <strong>the</strong> hilly part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country, in<br />

oppo-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!