The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ... The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

05.03.2013 Views

ti4 THE GENUINE HISTORY OF *' fore Bede's own time. If Bede therefore was " in an error with refpec^ to the origin of a *' people, whofe hiftory, on account of their " conneflion with the Romans, was known, it *' is much more probable that he knew nothing *' certain concerning the antiquities of a nation, *' who had not among them the means of pre- ** ferving, v/ith any certainty, the memory of *' events." This is the third argument againft Bede. And it is, I think, of as little avail as the other two.—Bede has committed no miftake, even upon Mr. Macphcrfon's own ftatc of the cafe. He derives the original Britons from Armorica : but he derives them very dubioufiy. In primis, fays he, hsec infula Britones foliim, a quibus nomen accepit, incolas habuit, qui dc traftu Armoricano, ut fertur, Bricanniam advedli '. And his derivation of the original Britons from Ar- morica, even if pofitively afferted, does not fu- perfede, as Mr. Macpherfon imagines, the re- migration of Britons into that country afterwards, becaufe it is not contrary to it. The name of Armorica feems, from the (liifting application of it by antient authors, and from the full import of the word, which fignifies the people upon the fca, to have once extended * L. i. c. I. along

THE BRITONS ASSERTED. 21^ along the whole compafs of the Gallic coaft from the Bay of Bifcay to the Rhine. In the days of Casfar, it comprized a variety of dates in Weftern Gaul '. In the days of Pliny, it reached from the Pyrenees to the Garonne *. And in the days of Sidonius Apollinaris it was carried much farther to the North-Eaft, and included, and even feems to have been reftriflied to, the compafs of the prefent.Bretagne -'. In this general acceptation of the word, the Britons were certainly derived from Armorica. And at the eaftern point of the Gallic coaft, and dire6lly oppofite to the great Angle of Kent, even Bede places the Morini, a name exaftly the fame as Ar-Mor-ic-i, and feem- ingly the continuation of it 4, Whether the Britons ever re-migrated into France, and fixed the appellation of Britanni on the continent, has been much difputed. But, I think, it may be fatisfa£loriiy decided. That they actually tranfmigrated, is evident from hiftory. They paffed into Gaul under the con- duft of Maximus, and fettled afterwards in Ar- morica, as is afferted by Llowarch Hen and Nennius s. And they fettled in Gaul upon the firft invafion of the Saxons, as is affirmed by Gildas, Bede, and Eginhard ^. But in both ' P. 108 find 47. * L. iv. c. 17. ' Carte, v. I. p. 7. a note. "^ L. i. c. i ^ Carte, v. I. p. 1 69. a note, and Nennius, c. 23. * Gildas, c. ^5. alii tranf- P 4 thefe

THE BRITONS ASSERTED. 21^<br />

along <strong>the</strong> whole compafs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gallic coaft from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Bay <strong>of</strong> Bifcay to <strong>the</strong> Rhine. In <strong>the</strong> days<br />

<strong>of</strong> Casfar, it comprized a variety <strong>of</strong> dates in<br />

Weftern Gaul '. In <strong>the</strong> days <strong>of</strong> Pliny, it reached<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Pyrenees to <strong>the</strong> Garonne *. And in <strong>the</strong><br />

days <strong>of</strong> Sidonius Apollinaris it was carried much<br />

far<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> North-Eaft, and included, and even<br />

feems to have been reftriflied to, <strong>the</strong> compafs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

prefent.Bretagne<br />

-'. In this general acceptation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Britons</strong> were certainly derived<br />

from Armorica. And at <strong>the</strong> eaftern point <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Gallic coaft, and dire6lly opp<strong>of</strong>ite to <strong>the</strong> great<br />

Angle <strong>of</strong> Kent, even Bede places <strong>the</strong> Morini, a<br />

name exaftly <strong>the</strong> fame as Ar-Mor-ic-i, and feem-<br />

ingly <strong>the</strong> continuation <strong>of</strong> it 4,<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> <strong>Britons</strong> ever re-migrated into<br />

France, and fixed <strong>the</strong> appellation <strong>of</strong> Britanni<br />

on <strong>the</strong> continent, has been much difputed.<br />

But, I think, it may be fatisfa£loriiy decided.<br />

That <strong>the</strong>y actually tranfmigrated, is evident from<br />

hiftory. <strong>The</strong>y paffed into Gaul under <strong>the</strong> con-<br />

duft <strong>of</strong> Maximus, and fettled afterwards in Ar-<br />

morica, as is afferted by Llowarch Hen and<br />

Nennius s. And <strong>the</strong>y fettled in Gaul upon <strong>the</strong><br />

firft invafion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Saxons, as is affirmed by<br />

Gildas, Bede, and Eginhard ^. But in both<br />

' P. 108 find 47. * L. iv. c. 17. ' Carte, v. I. p. 7.<br />

a note. "^ L. i. c. i ^ Carte, v. I. p. 1 69. a<br />

note, and Nennius, c. 23. * Gildas, c. ^5. alii tranf-<br />

P 4<br />

<strong>the</strong>fe

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!