The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ... The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

05.03.2013 Views

i2z THE GENUINE HISTORY Of of problematical arguments may be propagated ad infinitum, and equally on either fide of an hifliorical queftion. And they are of no confequence at all, either way, as to the fa£l:. The Scots may have paffed over into the weflern ' Caledonia, though the fertility of the country could be no inducement. The Irifli of Dalrieta may have fettled in Argyle, though the fouth of Ireland was more attrafting. And Hiftory ex- prefsly alTures us that they did. P. roy. " The Irifh mufl: have been wonder- *' fully improved in military knowledge from the ^' days of Agrlcola, if it was more difficult [for " the Irifh of Dalrieta] in the fourth century to *' extort part of their dominions from them, than *' from the Caledonians, who had better oppor- *' tunides to be enured to arms." This argument is dire£ted only againft the fup- poiition of the Scots fettling by force in Caledo- nia. But that is too improbable in itfelf, to be fuppofed by any who are converfant with the hif- tories of Caledonia and Ireland. And it flands diredly refuted by the well-known concurrence of the Caledonians and Iriili fettlers, in in- curfions into the Pvoman province, within a few years only after the fettiement, The great point .' . art; '

THE BRITONS ASSERTED. 183 It which Mr. Macpherfon fliouki direct his argu- ments is, That the Iriih could not have fixed themfelves in Argyle by the confent of the Cale- donians. And for this purpofe he Ihould fpecify all the various modes of fettling amicably in a countr}^, and fliew the impoffibility, or at lead the high improbability, of each of thefe with refpeft to the Caledonians and the Irifn. P. 107— 108, " Should It be fuppofed that a *' band of adv^enturers were exi elkd from Ulfler *' by the prefTure of the fouthern Irilh, it is *' difficult to account how the Pi£ls of Britain *' Ihould receive the fugitives. Either generofity *' or felfifhnefs would have prompted them— to *' affifl; the exiles in recovering their territories, *' and, by that means, to endeavour to conquer a *' part of a fine country for themfelves. But the *^ Pi£ls were, it feems, ftrangers to the moft com- *' men maxims of policy ; for, according to the *' fyflem under confideration, -they muft have " been of all nations the mod tame, prodigal, and ** imprudent." This is exaftly in the fame tenour and fpnit as one or two arguments before. The Caledo- nians might be of all nations the moft tame, pro- digal, and imprudent, if the fa^ was true ; and N yet 4

i2z THE GENUINE HISTORY Of<br />

<strong>of</strong> problematical arguments may be propagated<br />

ad infinitum, and equally on ei<strong>the</strong>r fide <strong>of</strong> an<br />

hifliorical queftion. And <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>of</strong> no confequence<br />

at all, ei<strong>the</strong>r way, as to <strong>the</strong> fa£l:. <strong>The</strong><br />

Scots may have paffed over into <strong>the</strong> weflern<br />

'<br />

Caledonia, though <strong>the</strong> fertility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country<br />

could be no inducement. <strong>The</strong> Irifli <strong>of</strong> Dalrieta<br />

may have fettled in Argyle, though <strong>the</strong> fouth <strong>of</strong><br />

Ireland was more attrafting. And Hiftory ex-<br />

prefsly alTures us that <strong>the</strong>y did.<br />

P. roy. " <strong>The</strong> Irifh mufl: have been wonder-<br />

*' fully improved in military knowledge from <strong>the</strong><br />

^' days <strong>of</strong> Agrlcola, if it was more difficult [for<br />

" <strong>the</strong> Irifh <strong>of</strong> Dalrieta] in <strong>the</strong> fourth century to<br />

*' extort part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir dominions from <strong>the</strong>m, than<br />

*' from <strong>the</strong> Caledonians, who had better oppor-<br />

*' tunides to be enured to arms."<br />

This argument is dire£ted only againft <strong>the</strong> fup-<br />

poiition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Scots fettling by force in Caledo-<br />

nia. But that is too improbable in itfelf, to be<br />

fupp<strong>of</strong>ed by any who are converfant with <strong>the</strong> hif-<br />

tories <strong>of</strong> Caledonia and Ireland. And it flands<br />

diredly refuted by <strong>the</strong> well-known concurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caledonians and Iriili fettlers, in in-<br />

curfions into <strong>the</strong> Pvoman province, within a few<br />

years only after <strong>the</strong> fettiement, <strong>The</strong> great point<br />

.' . art;<br />

'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!