The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ... The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

05.03.2013 Views

. was 146 THE GENUINE HISTORY OF we have of the Belgic, the names of their tribes, their towns, their woods, and their rivers, and the exaft correfpondency of all to the names of the Britiih. Thus we have Ifca, the appellation of a river among the Belgse of Devonfhire and the Britons of Wales; Alauna, for a river in Hamp- fliire, Warwickfliire, and Lancalhire; and a Stu- rius in Kent and between Norfolk and Suffolk : the town of Camulodunum among the Belgce of Effex and the Britons of Yorkfliire ; Durobrovis in Kent, and Durocobrivis in Northamptonftiire Venta in Hampfliire, Norfolk, and Monmouth- fliire; and Veftis in Hampfliire, and Veft-urion-es in Scotland : a Caledonian Wood in Kent and SufTex, in Lincolnfliire and forae adjoining counties, and in the Highlands of Scodand : the Dam- nonii of Devonfhire and Valentia ; the Cantse of Caledonia, and the Cantii of Kent ; and the Novantes of Middlefex and Galloway. The whole of this palTage is obvioufly compofed, in order to give the Caledonians the honour of being the ancedors of thelriih. For this, hiftory and reafon are diflorted. For this, Mr. Mac- pherfon is at war with himfelf. And, for this, even OfTian is contradifted. But, even if the fa£l as Mr. Macpherfon ftates it to frave been, the end and defign, poor and trifling as it is, could not be anfwered. Even though the Belgas had been loft in the Gael, and even though the Qael had been Caledoiiians, the Caledonians could

THE BRITONS ASSERTED, 147 could in no fenfe be reckoned the fole progeni- tors of the old Irifli. The Irifli muft even then be derived from a mixt race of Britons ; and the Belg£e of South-Britain muft have concurred with the Gael of the North, to claim the honour of producing them. Though the Belg^e had been covered with the name of Gael, they would not Icfs have been Belgse, or have lefs contributed to -produce the Irifh. f. 55— 57. " When the Gael arrived firft In ** Ireland they naturally giive it the name of lar- " in, or the weftern country.— From lar-in is " not only to be deduced the Eirin of the Irilh ^^ themfelves, but thofe various nam.es by which *' the Greeks and Romans diflinguilhed their *' ifland (Juverna, lerna. Iris, Ovc-^vLoi^ Hibernia). " —Hibernia, the moft common name by which " the Romans diftinguilhed Ireland, may appear *' to fome too remote in the pronunciation and " orthography from lar-in, or H'Eirin \the " Weftern Country], to be derived from either. *' This difficulty is eafily removed. Julius Csefar ** mentions, for the firft time, Ireland under the " name of Hibernia. One of two reafons in- *' duced the iiluftrious writer to ufe that appel- *' lation. He either latinized die H'Yverdhon of *' the Southern Britains, or, what is more proba- jL 2 ''h\t.

THE BRITONS ASSERTED, 147<br />

could in no fenfe be reckoned <strong>the</strong> fole progeni-<br />

tors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old Irifli. <strong>The</strong> Irifli muft even <strong>the</strong>n<br />

be derived from a mixt race <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britons</strong> ;<br />

and <strong>the</strong><br />

Belg£e <strong>of</strong> South-Britain muft have concurred with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gael <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> North, to claim <strong>the</strong> honour <strong>of</strong><br />

producing <strong>the</strong>m. Though <strong>the</strong> Belg^e had been<br />

covered with <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Gael, <strong>the</strong>y would not<br />

Icfs have been Belgse, or have lefs contributed to<br />

-produce <strong>the</strong> Irifh.<br />

f. 55— 57. " When <strong>the</strong> Gael arrived firft In<br />

** Ireland <strong>the</strong>y naturally giive it <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> lar-<br />

" in, or <strong>the</strong> weftern country.— From lar-in is<br />

" not only to be deduced <strong>the</strong> Eirin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Irilh<br />

^^ <strong>the</strong>mfelves, but th<strong>of</strong>e various nam.es by which<br />

*' <strong>the</strong> Greeks and Romans diflinguilhed <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

*' ifland (Juverna, lerna. Iris, Ovc-^vLoi^ Hibernia).<br />

" —Hibernia, <strong>the</strong> m<strong>of</strong>t common name by which<br />

" <strong>the</strong> Romans diftinguilhed Ireland, may appear<br />

*' to fome too remote in <strong>the</strong> pronunciation and<br />

" orthography from lar-in, or H'Eirin \<strong>the</strong><br />

" Weftern Country], to be derived from ei<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

*' This difficulty is eafily removed. Julius Csefar<br />

** mentions, for <strong>the</strong> firft time, Ireland under <strong>the</strong><br />

" name <strong>of</strong> Hibernia. One <strong>of</strong> two reafons in-<br />

*' duced <strong>the</strong> iiluftrious writer to ufe that appel-<br />

*' lation. He ei<strong>the</strong>r latinized die H'Yverdhon <strong>of</strong><br />

*' <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Britains, or, what is more proba-<br />

jL 2 ''h\t.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!