The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ... The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

05.03.2013 Views

?4o THE GENUINE HISTORY OF to prove, that the Iriih were derived from the Caledonians. And at the clofe of it he concludes, that the Irifli were derived— from the native Gauls. The name of Gael demonftrates the Irifli to " derive their blood from tkofe Gael or Gauls, *' who, in an after-period, were dijlinguijhed by *' the name of Caledonians.'^ And the name of Gael proves the Scots, the Pi6ls, and the Irifli to have *' derived their origin from the fame fource, *' the antient Gael of the continent'* Vainly imagining, in oppofition to the moft obvious evidences, that the name of Gael in Britain was appropriated entirely to the Caledonians ; and wildly fuppofmg, in contradiction to the moft ex- prefs declarations of hiftory, that the other tribes of Bri^-ain were German-Celtic; Mr. Macpher- fon goes on with a falfe aflbciation of ideas from the beginning to the clofe of his work, walking in one circle of errors, and plunging into abfurdi- ties and contradi£lions at every turn. P. 54. a note. ** Mr. O'Connor, who lately '^ gave to the public fome wild, incoherent *' tales, concerning the antient Irifli, endeavours *' to obviate the flrength of the argument, *•' which rifes againft his fyftem from the name " of Gael, by difguifing the word by the in- " fertion of the intermediate letters, dh, as thus, « Qadhel

THE BRITONS ASSERTED. 141 '' Gadhel. The fubterfuge avails nothing, dh " are univerfally quiefcent, or at moft found " like a y, in every dialed! of the Celtic lan- " guage.'* The argument deduced from Gael may be effectual againfl Mr. O'Connor's fyftem, but, as I have already Ihewn, is of no force to eftablilh Mr. Macpherfon's. The indigenous appellation of Gael for the Irifli ferves ftrongly to evince them, what hiilory demonftrates them to be, the defcendants of the Britons. But it ferves not in the leaft to point out the particular divifion of Britain, from which they were immediately de- rived. Mr. Macpherfon^s intimate acquaintance with the Celtic language, was fuch an advantage over the body of our hiftorical writers, that he might very juftly, as he does in p. 5 and 38, plume himfelf confiderably upon it. But I have pre- vioufly remarked, that his knowledge of the Celtic appeared to be confined within the pale of a fmgle dialed. And the prefent Extract con- firms me in the opinion. Mr. Macpherfon In p. 46 commends the author of the Critical Dif- fertations, for his *' great knowledge of all the " Ranches of the Celtic language." The know- ledge of both, however, feems to me to have been confined almofl entirely to the Irifli or Erfe. And it particularly feems fo here. Mr. Macpherfon could not otherwife have imagined, as he here alTerts,

?4o THE GENUINE HISTORY OF<br />

to prove, that <strong>the</strong> Iriih were derived from <strong>the</strong><br />

Caledonians. And at <strong>the</strong> cl<strong>of</strong>e <strong>of</strong> it he concludes,<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Irifli were derived— from <strong>the</strong> native<br />

Gauls. <strong>The</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Gael demonftrates <strong>the</strong> Irifli<br />

to " derive <strong>the</strong>ir blood from tk<strong>of</strong>e Gael or Gauls,<br />

*' who, in an after-period, were dijlinguijhed by<br />

*' <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Caledonians.'^ And <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong><br />

Gael proves <strong>the</strong> Scots, <strong>the</strong> Pi6ls, and <strong>the</strong> Irifli to<br />

have *' derived <strong>the</strong>ir origin from <strong>the</strong> fame fource,<br />

*' <strong>the</strong> antient Gael <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> continent'* Vainly<br />

imagining, in opp<strong>of</strong>ition to <strong>the</strong> m<strong>of</strong>t obvious<br />

evidences, that <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Gael in Britain was<br />

appropriated entirely to <strong>the</strong> Caledonians ; and<br />

wildly fupp<strong>of</strong>mg, in contradiction to <strong>the</strong> m<strong>of</strong>t ex-<br />

prefs declarations <strong>of</strong> hiftory, that <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r tribes<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bri^-ain were German-Celtic; <strong>Mr</strong>. Macpher-<br />

fon goes on with a falfe aflbciation <strong>of</strong> ideas from<br />

<strong>the</strong> beginning to <strong>the</strong> cl<strong>of</strong>e <strong>of</strong> his work, walking<br />

in one circle <strong>of</strong> errors, and plunging into abfurdi-<br />

ties and contradi£lions at every turn.<br />

P. 54. a note. ** <strong>Mr</strong>. O'Connor, who lately<br />

'^ gave to <strong>the</strong> public fome wild, incoherent<br />

*' tales, concerning <strong>the</strong> antient Irifli, endeavours<br />

*' to obviate <strong>the</strong> flrength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> argument,<br />

*•' which rifes againft his fyftem from <strong>the</strong> name<br />

" <strong>of</strong> Gael, by difguifing <strong>the</strong> word by <strong>the</strong> in-<br />

" fertion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intermediate letters, dh, as thus,<br />

« Qadhel

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!