The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ... The genuine history of the Britons asserted against Mr. Macpherson ...

05.03.2013 Views

112 THE GENUINE HISTORY OF the fa£t. The Romans were well acquainted with Ireland, though they never vifited it. And they aflually reduced three fourths of Mr. Mac- pherfon's Caledonians. The Romans muft have been well acquainted with a people, with whom, as friends or enemies, they had a continual and uninterrupted intercourfe of nearly four centu- ries. And they have aftually left us a very par- ticular account of all the tribes of Caledonia^ iri Ptolemy and Richard. P. 41— 42, "Julius xlgrkola, who, for the '^ firil time, difpiayed the Roman eagles beyond *' the Friths, was not more fuccefsfal in the field " than he was happy in an hiflorian to tranfmit *' his anions with ludre to pollerity. But even *' the diftincl and Intelligent Tacitus gives but a *' very imperfeft idea of thofe enemies, by the " defeat of whom his father-in-law acquired {o *' much reputation. We learn from him indeed '* that the Caledonians were the moft antient in- *' habitants of' Britain." Here the author evidendy fixes the Caledonians beyond the Friths. And yet, as I have fliewed in the laft article, he brings them In p. 32 down as low as the Tweed. Hov/ Inaccurate !—And here is alfo another great inaccuracy. Froni Tacitus we learn, if we may aicribc the fpeech of

THE BRITONS ASSERTED. 113 of Galgacns to him, not that the Caledonianswerc the inoft antient inhabitants of Britain, but that they were the mod honourable, nobiliffimi toiius Britannia;. And fiourifhes like that, in fuch ad- drefTes as Galgacus's, it is idle to adduce for an hiftorical authority; P. 42—44. " This is the fum of what the " Romans have related concerning the Caledo- ** nians for near two centuries after they were " firft mentioned : to their origin and internal '* hiftory they were equally ilrangers.—Had the " Romans eftabhflied themfelves in Caledonia, *' we might indeed have known more of the an- ** tient inhabitants of that country— . The firft ** domeftic writers of the hiflory of North Bri- ** tain were too ignorant, as well as too modern, *' to form any probable fyflem concerning the ** origin of their nation.'* I have already Ihewn, that the Romans did eftablifh themfelves in Caledonia, and that they reduced one half even of the genuine Caledoni- ans, the Britons to the North of the Friths. And as to the ignorance of the Romans, con- cerning the interior hiftorj^ and origin of the Ca- ledonians before their invafion, they were equal- ly ignorant concerning the Britons in general. I Whence

112 THE GENUINE HISTORY OF<br />

<strong>the</strong> fa£t. <strong>The</strong> Romans were well acquainted<br />

with Ireland, though <strong>the</strong>y never vifited it. And<br />

<strong>the</strong>y aflually reduced three fourths <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mr</strong>. Mac-<br />

pherfon's Caledonians. <strong>The</strong> Romans muft have<br />

been well acquainted with a people, with whom,<br />

as friends or enemies, <strong>the</strong>y had a continual and<br />

uninterrupted intercourfe <strong>of</strong> nearly four centu-<br />

ries. And <strong>the</strong>y have aftually left us a very par-<br />

ticular account <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> tribes <strong>of</strong> Caledonia^ iri<br />

Ptolemy and Richard.<br />

P. 41—<br />

42, "Julius xlgrkola, who, for <strong>the</strong><br />

'^<br />

firil time, difpiayed <strong>the</strong> Roman eagles beyond<br />

*' <strong>the</strong> Friths, was not more fuccefsfal in <strong>the</strong> field<br />

" than he was happy in an hiflorian to tranfmit<br />

*' his anions with ludre to pollerity. But even<br />

*' <strong>the</strong> diftincl and Intelligent Tacitus gives but a<br />

*' very imperfeft idea <strong>of</strong> th<strong>of</strong>e enemies, by <strong>the</strong><br />

" defeat <strong>of</strong> whom his fa<strong>the</strong>r-in-law acquired {o<br />

*' much reputation. We learn from him indeed<br />

'* that <strong>the</strong> Caledonians were <strong>the</strong> m<strong>of</strong>t antient in-<br />

*' habitants <strong>of</strong>' Britain."<br />

Here <strong>the</strong> author evidendy fixes <strong>the</strong> Caledonians<br />

beyond <strong>the</strong> Friths. And yet, as I have fliewed<br />

in <strong>the</strong> laft article, he brings <strong>the</strong>m In p. 32 down<br />

as low as <strong>the</strong> Tweed. Hov/ Inaccurate !—And<br />

here is alfo ano<strong>the</strong>r great inaccuracy. Froni<br />

Tacitus we learn, if we may aicribc <strong>the</strong> fpeech<br />

<strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!