Rowville-Rail-Study-Final-Stage-1-Report-FINAL
Rowville-Rail-Study-Final-Stage-1-Report-FINAL Rowville-Rail-Study-Final-Stage-1-Report-FINAL
Figure 10 – Existing public transport Source: Public Transport Victoria Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report Existing and future conditions Page 21
Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report Existing and future conditions Across the whole metropolitan bus network, patronage increased by 34% to 106 million boardings over the five years to 2010/11. Growth on SmartBus routes has been greater than this (see Figure 11). In 2010/11, Route 900 carried about 5,500 passengers each weekday, a 135% increase since its introduction in 2006. Figure 11 – SmartBus route patronage growth comparisons 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Source: Public Transport Victoria In July 2011, a new express bus route was introduced between Huntingdale station and Monash University. Route 601 runs every four minutes on weekdays during the semester between 7am and 7pm and requires a pre-paid ticket. The service is very well used, and after a year-long trial it is now a permanent service. 3.6.3 Cycling Growth in patronage on Smartbus routes (up to 16 July 2011) compared to the 12 months prior to operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Years since each SmartBus route was introduced Route 900 - Stud Park to Caulfield Route 903 - Mordialloc to Altona Route 700 - Mordialloc to Box Hill Route 901 - Frankston to Melbourne Airport DART - Routes 905,906,907 and 908 Route 888/889 - Chelsea to Nunawading Route 902 - Chelsea to Airport West Route 703 - Blackburn Road Route 901 - Frankston to Ringwood Figure 12 shows the Principal Bicycle Network (PBN) in the Rowville rail line area (note that the PBN is under review and could change significantly). There is a reasonably continuous bike route along Wellington and North Roads, with links to service Monash University and other significant destinations along the way. However the paths that form this route are variously in the median, on the north or south sides of the road or part of the on road bus lane. There are several places where path continuity could be improved, and in general the facilities are poor. Cyclists do not have priority at road crossings and signals are not optimised to reduce cyclist delays. Page 22
- Page 1 and 2: Rowville Rail Study - Public Plan i
- Page 3 and 4: Contents Foreword .................
- Page 5 and 6: Executive summary Introduction Fina
- Page 7 and 8: Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report Ex
- Page 9 and 10: area in the interim period leading
- Page 11 and 12: 2. History of Rowville rail line A
- Page 13 and 14: cost implications for the Huntingda
- Page 15 and 16: 3. Existing and future conditions F
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 6 - Land uses in the Rowvill
- Page 19 and 20: Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report Ex
- Page 21 and 22: 3.5.1 Journeys to work Table 3 - Jo
- Page 23: Source: VicRoads Figure 9 - SmartRo
- Page 27 and 28: influence on the design and operati
- Page 29 and 30: Activity Description Participation/
- Page 31 and 32: “Rowville and residents in surrou
- Page 33 and 34: Subject area Summary of submissions
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 14 - Summary of suggestions
- Page 37 and 38: Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report A
- Page 39 and 40: 6.1.4 Implications for the rail net
- Page 41 and 42: passenger capacity may also be requ
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 17 - Illustrative cross sect
- Page 45 and 46: 6.2.2 Station locations and layouts
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 21 - Mulgrave station cross
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 25 - Rowville station cross
- Page 51 and 52: Table 10 - Summary comparison of Ro
- Page 53 and 54: Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report A
- Page 55 and 56: 7. Travel demand effects Final Stag
- Page 57 and 58: Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report Tr
- Page 59 and 60: Source: VITM modelling of Rowville
- Page 61 and 62: Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report Tr
- Page 63 and 64: 8. Costs, benefits and impacts 8.1
- Page 65 and 66: 8.5 Environmental and social effect
- Page 67 and 68: 8.1 Conclusions Final Stage 1 Feasi
- Page 69 and 70: 9.2 Recommended actions Our recomme
<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Feasibility <strong>Report</strong><br />
Existing and future conditions<br />
Across the whole metropolitan bus network, patronage increased by 34% to 106 million<br />
boardings over the five years to 2010/11. Growth on SmartBus routes has been greater than<br />
this (see Figure 11). In 2010/11, Route 900 carried about 5,500 passengers each weekday, a<br />
135% increase since its introduction in 2006.<br />
Figure 11 – SmartBus route patronage growth comparisons<br />
160%<br />
140%<br />
120%<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
0%<br />
Source: Public Transport Victoria<br />
In July 2011, a new express bus route was introduced between Huntingdale station and<br />
Monash University. Route 601 runs every four minutes on weekdays during the semester<br />
between 7am and 7pm and requires a pre-paid ticket. The service is very well used, and<br />
after a year-long trial it is now a permanent service.<br />
3.6.3 Cycling<br />
Growth in patronage on Smartbus routes (up to 16 July 2011) compared to the 12 months prior to operation<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />
Years since each SmartBus route was introduced<br />
Route 900 - Stud Park to Caulfield Route 903 - Mordialloc to Altona<br />
Route 700 - Mordialloc to Box Hill Route 901 - Frankston to Melbourne Airport<br />
DART - Routes 905,906,907 and 908 Route 888/889 - Chelsea to Nunawading<br />
Route 902 - Chelsea to Airport West Route 703 - Blackburn Road<br />
Route 901 - Frankston to Ringwood<br />
Figure 12 shows the Principal Bicycle Network (PBN) in the <strong>Rowville</strong> rail line area (note that<br />
the PBN is under review and could change significantly).<br />
There is a reasonably continuous bike route along Wellington and North Roads, with links to<br />
service Monash University and other significant destinations along the way. However the<br />
paths that form this route are variously in the median, on the north or south sides of the road<br />
or part of the on road bus lane. There are several places where path continuity could be<br />
improved, and in general the facilities are poor. Cyclists do not have priority at road crossings<br />
and signals are not optimised to reduce cyclist delays.<br />
Page 22