Rowville-Rail-Study-Final-Stage-1-Report-FINAL

Rowville-Rail-Study-Final-Stage-1-Report-FINAL Rowville-Rail-Study-Final-Stage-1-Report-FINAL

augustusbrown
from augustusbrown More from this publisher
05.03.2013 Views

Figure 7 – Effective job density in Melbourne Source: SGS Economics and Planning, 2011 3.5 Travel patterns Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report Existing and future conditions Monash Uni Clayton campus Rowville rail line Personal travel in the Rowville rail line area, in common with most of suburban Melbourne, is dominated by car use. As shown in Table 3, well over 80% of journeys to work originating in the Rowville rail link area in 2006 were by car, and only 10% were by public transport. Page 17

3.5.1 Journeys to work Table 3 – Journeys to work originating in the area (2006 Census) Journeys to work by mode of transport Final Stage 1 Feasibility Report Existing and future conditions Public transport 870 760 620 1,030 150 370 570 4,370 201,060 Car/motorcycle 13,830 7,430 5,950 2,810 500 1,780 2,880 35,180 1,127,190 Cycle 50 30 30 60 10 40 40 260 18,890 Walk 150 100 110 440 20 80 70 960 51,380 Other/not stated 390 280 220 140 10 70 130 1,230 47,400 Total 15,290 8,600 6,930 4,480 690 2,340 3,690 42,000 1,445,920 Mode shares Public transport 5.7% 8.8% 8.9% 23.0% 21.7% 15.8% 15.4% 10.4% 13.9% Car/motorcycle 90.5% 86.4% 85.9% 62.7% 72.5% 76.1% 78.0% 83.8% 78.0% Cycle 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 1.3% 1.4% 1.7% 1.1% 0.6% 1.3% Walk 1.0% 1.2% 1.6% 9.8% 2.9% 3.4% 1.9% 2.3% 3.6% Other/not stated 2.6% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 1.4% 3.0% 3.5% 2.9% 3.3% About 42,000 journeys to work originated in the Rowville rail line area in the 2006 Census. The use of public transport, walking and cycling for journeys to work generally increased from east to west across the area. Over 90% of journeys to work starting in Rowville were by private motorised vehicles, compared with 63% in Clayton (reflecting the high proportion of students in the population there). It is to be expected that public transport’s share of journeys to work has increased somewhat since 2006, especially given the improved bus services since then. 3.5.2 Journeys to school or study Another key feature of travel in the area is that generated by Monash University and other secondary and tertiary education facilities. During consultations the many problems with this aspect of travel have been well communicated to us, especially in relation to student travel to and from Monash University Clayton campus. Monash University’s advocacy document for the Rowville rail line spells out the substantial future growth that is being planned for in and around the Clayton campus, both in student numbers and employees. 3.5.3 Future travel growth We have used VITM to assess future growth in travel with and without a Rowville rail line. The results are discussed in more detail in Chapter 7, however the model suggests that, with the population and employment growth assumptions from VIF 2008 (see Table 1), overall travel demand generated or attracted by land uses in the Rowville rail line area on a typical weekday could increase by about one-third between now and 2046. Page 18

3.5.1 Journeys to work<br />

Table 3 – Journeys to work originating in the area (2006 Census)<br />

Journeys to work by mode of transport<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 1 Feasibility <strong>Report</strong><br />

Existing and future conditions<br />

Public transport 870 760 620 1,030 150 370 570 4,370 201,060<br />

Car/motorcycle 13,830 7,430 5,950 2,810 500 1,780 2,880 35,180 1,127,190<br />

Cycle 50 30 30 60 10 40 40 260 18,890<br />

Walk 150 100 110 440 20 80 70 960 51,380<br />

Other/not stated 390 280 220 140 10 70 130 1,230 47,400<br />

Total 15,290 8,600 6,930 4,480 690 2,340 3,690 42,000 1,445,920<br />

Mode shares<br />

Public transport 5.7% 8.8% 8.9% 23.0% 21.7% 15.8% 15.4% 10.4% 13.9%<br />

Car/motorcycle 90.5% 86.4% 85.9% 62.7% 72.5% 76.1% 78.0% 83.8% 78.0%<br />

Cycle 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 1.3% 1.4% 1.7% 1.1% 0.6% 1.3%<br />

Walk 1.0% 1.2% 1.6% 9.8% 2.9% 3.4% 1.9% 2.3% 3.6%<br />

Other/not stated 2.6% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 1.4% 3.0% 3.5% 2.9% 3.3%<br />

About 42,000 journeys to work originated in the <strong>Rowville</strong> rail line area in the 2006 Census.<br />

The use of public transport, walking and cycling for journeys to work generally increased<br />

from east to west across the area. Over 90% of journeys to work starting in <strong>Rowville</strong> were by<br />

private motorised vehicles, compared with 63% in Clayton (reflecting the high proportion of<br />

students in the population there).<br />

It is to be expected that public transport’s share of journeys to work has increased somewhat<br />

since 2006, especially given the improved bus services since then.<br />

3.5.2 Journeys to school or study<br />

Another key feature of travel in the area is that generated by Monash University and other<br />

secondary and tertiary education facilities. During consultations the many problems with this<br />

aspect of travel have been well communicated to us, especially in relation to student travel to<br />

and from Monash University Clayton campus. Monash University’s advocacy document for<br />

the <strong>Rowville</strong> rail line spells out the substantial future growth that is being planned for in and<br />

around the Clayton campus, both in student numbers and employees.<br />

3.5.3 Future travel growth<br />

We have used VITM to assess future growth in travel with and without a <strong>Rowville</strong> rail line.<br />

The results are discussed in more detail in Chapter 7, however the model suggests that, with<br />

the population and employment growth assumptions from VIF 2008 (see Table 1), overall<br />

travel demand generated or attracted by land uses in the <strong>Rowville</strong> rail line area on a typical<br />

weekday could increase by about one-third between now and 2046.<br />

Page 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!