05.03.2013 Views

May '11 PR Rankings Issue - Odwyerpr.com

May '11 PR Rankings Issue - Odwyerpr.com

May '11 PR Rankings Issue - Odwyerpr.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OPINION<br />

Caution: tweeting may be hazardous to your rep<br />

By Fraser Seitel<br />

If you think Japan is the only radioactive<br />

place on the planet, try tweeting.<br />

Twitter, the five-year-old, 150-million<br />

user, social networking service with the<br />

prodigious following<br />

and the dubious<br />

profit potential, is<br />

rapidly be<strong>com</strong>ing<br />

the quickest way to<br />

annihilate your reputation<br />

and lose your<br />

job, in one 140-character<br />

swoop.<br />

Fraser P. Seitel has<br />

been a <strong>com</strong>munications<br />

consultant, author and<br />

teacher for 30 years. He<br />

is the author of the<br />

Prentice-Hall text, The<br />

Practice of Public<br />

Relations.<br />

52<br />

Latest to fall victim<br />

to “execution by<br />

tweet” was Cappie<br />

Pondexter, a Rutgers<br />

graduate and shooting<br />

guard for the<br />

New York Liberty<br />

of the Women’s<br />

National Basketball Association.<br />

Ms. Pondexter, for a reason known only<br />

to her, saw the carnage in Japan and<br />

tweeted, “What if God was tired of the<br />

way they treated their own people in<br />

there own country! Idk guys he makes no<br />

mistakes.”<br />

A day later, after somebody evidently<br />

suggested a Henry Kissinger she was<br />

not, Ms. Pondexter tweeted, “I wanna<br />

apologize to anyone I may hurt or offended<br />

... the least thing I wanted was to hurt<br />

or offend.”<br />

In an instant, because of her nitwit<br />

tweet, Ms. Pondexter’s reputation was<br />

toasted, not to mention the reputation of<br />

Rutgers, which saw fit to award a degree<br />

to an apparent illiterate.<br />

Ms. Pondexter’s learned international<br />

tweet-mentary, of course, followed a similarly<br />

thoughtful tweatise on Japan from<br />

erstwhile Aflac spokesman Gilbert<br />

Gottfried and another tweet by a Chrysler<br />

social media <strong>PR</strong> consultant that questioned,<br />

in most spicy language, the<br />

driving <strong>com</strong>petence of Detroiters.<br />

As a result of said tweets, Ms.<br />

Pondexter lost her reputation, Mr.<br />

Gottfried his Aflac gig, and the <strong>PR</strong><br />

consultant his job.<br />

And that’s the point.<br />

While Twitter might be great for rallying<br />

the populace and bringing down<br />

dictators, it can positively destroy you.<br />

Indeed, the reputational risk/reward<br />

ratio of tweeting for any individual inter-<br />

MAY 2011 WWW.ODWYER<strong>PR</strong>.COM<br />

ested in earning a living — including<br />

celebrities and sports stars and CEOs —<br />

is questionable. While a persuasive tweet<br />

might marginally assist a marketing<br />

effort, an errant tweet can ruin a<br />

reputation.<br />

The indisputable fact is that just<br />

because you are a Hollywood celebrity or<br />

a professional athlete or even the top<br />

executive in a major corporation doesn’t<br />

mean you’re all that bright or attuned to<br />

public sensibilities. And unless you’re<br />

Charlie Sheen, 50 Cent or some equivalent<br />

multi-millionaire sociopath, you<br />

need to think twice before tweeting.<br />

And “thinking twice” in terms of<br />

Twitter translates to the following:<br />

Have a reason to tweet.<br />

The top tweeters, based on followers<br />

are: Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber and<br />

Britney Spears.<br />

The latter is selling a <strong>com</strong>eback record<br />

album, the middle one is selling a documentary<br />

film, and the former is selling<br />

anything she can get her hands on —<br />

music, apparel, electronic equipment,<br />

you name it. (In fact, if you want to learn<br />

something about modern merchandising,<br />

look no further than the brazen bombshell.)<br />

The point is that these people are all<br />

“selling” something; they have a reason<br />

to tweet.<br />

They’re not doing it on a whim, e.g.<br />

defaming Detroit drivers or bashing the<br />

Japanese.<br />

Tweet as part of a larger plan.<br />

Twitter absolutely should be an element<br />

in a marketing/public relations plan.<br />

Smart <strong>com</strong>panies, like Starbucks coffee<br />

or Southwest airlines or Zappos<br />

shoes, use Twitter, along with Facebook<br />

and other traditional and social media<br />

tools, to boost their brands and sell their<br />

products.<br />

Similarly, smart celebrities, like Oprah<br />

and Shaq and Madonna (and even twonamed<br />

celebs) use Twitter as part of a<br />

larger strategic plan to boost their causes<br />

and themselves.<br />

With just 140 characters, Twitter is best<br />

used as an “enticer,” a “grabber,” a<br />

“catalyst,” not as a marketing or public<br />

relations end in and of itself.<br />

Use Twitter to break news.<br />

For big celebrities, Twitter as “news<br />

breaker” has be<strong>com</strong>e its most potent use.<br />

When Sarah Palin wants to jump into<br />

the Arizona gun debate or Lindsay Lohan<br />

wants to “apologize” in advance of a<br />

Professional Development<br />

court hearing or Lady Gaga wants to<br />

insert herself into the gays-in-themilitary<br />

debate — they do it on Twitter.<br />

Their <strong>PR</strong> people then issue releases<br />

pointing reporters to the tweet, and bingo,<br />

“instant news.”<br />

This, of course, is an admittedly calculated<br />

use of this seemingly “scriptless”<br />

medium, just as a news release or a<br />

speech or a media advisory is used to<br />

stimulate coverage.<br />

Which leads to this final suggestion:<br />

Seek help before tweeting.<br />

Of course, this is heresy to every redblooded<br />

social media supporter of spontaneity.<br />

To the zealots, “falsifying” tweets<br />

is the most egregious violation of<br />

Twitterquette. A Twitter “conversation,”<br />

they say, should be just that — real,<br />

unedited, and unscripted by a paid<br />

advisor. Anything less, they argue,<br />

destroys credibility.<br />

Oh you poor misguided saps.<br />

Not even Biz Stone (look him up!) is<br />

naive enough to think that Bill Gates or Al<br />

Gore or Martha Stewart or Shakira or<br />

Oprah — Oprah, for goddsakes! — actually<br />

have time to author all their own tweets.<br />

Public relations people get paid for<br />

advising clients on the strategy and implementation<br />

of their <strong>com</strong>munications<br />

weaponry — from releases and speeches<br />

to memos and presentations. Part of that<br />

21st century arsenal are blogs and<br />

podcasts, Facebook postings and tweets.<br />

And they, too, should be influenced by<br />

counselors expert in the fine art of<br />

strategic <strong>com</strong>munication.<br />

Here’s why:<br />

Designer Kenneth Cole was ostracized<br />

after tweeting that his new spring collection<br />

was inspired by the unrest in the<br />

Middle East.<br />

New York University deep-sixed a wellknown<br />

research Fellow after his insensitive<br />

(some would say, “insane”) tweet badmouthing<br />

a CBS broadcaster sexually<br />

assaulted in Cairo.<br />

The Indiana Attorney General was<br />

sacked for tweeting that the Wisconsin<br />

police should use live ammo to fight union<br />

protestors.<br />

And then, of course, there were Gilbert<br />

and Chrysler and Cappie.<br />

All would have benefited from wise<br />

public relations counsel — not to mention,<br />

robust editing — before tweeting their<br />

reputations away.<br />

Sorry Twitter nation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!