May '11 PR Rankings Issue - Odwyerpr.com
May '11 PR Rankings Issue - Odwyerpr.com
May '11 PR Rankings Issue - Odwyerpr.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
OPINION<br />
Caution: tweeting may be hazardous to your rep<br />
By Fraser Seitel<br />
If you think Japan is the only radioactive<br />
place on the planet, try tweeting.<br />
Twitter, the five-year-old, 150-million<br />
user, social networking service with the<br />
prodigious following<br />
and the dubious<br />
profit potential, is<br />
rapidly be<strong>com</strong>ing<br />
the quickest way to<br />
annihilate your reputation<br />
and lose your<br />
job, in one 140-character<br />
swoop.<br />
Fraser P. Seitel has<br />
been a <strong>com</strong>munications<br />
consultant, author and<br />
teacher for 30 years. He<br />
is the author of the<br />
Prentice-Hall text, The<br />
Practice of Public<br />
Relations.<br />
52<br />
Latest to fall victim<br />
to “execution by<br />
tweet” was Cappie<br />
Pondexter, a Rutgers<br />
graduate and shooting<br />
guard for the<br />
New York Liberty<br />
of the Women’s<br />
National Basketball Association.<br />
Ms. Pondexter, for a reason known only<br />
to her, saw the carnage in Japan and<br />
tweeted, “What if God was tired of the<br />
way they treated their own people in<br />
there own country! Idk guys he makes no<br />
mistakes.”<br />
A day later, after somebody evidently<br />
suggested a Henry Kissinger she was<br />
not, Ms. Pondexter tweeted, “I wanna<br />
apologize to anyone I may hurt or offended<br />
... the least thing I wanted was to hurt<br />
or offend.”<br />
In an instant, because of her nitwit<br />
tweet, Ms. Pondexter’s reputation was<br />
toasted, not to mention the reputation of<br />
Rutgers, which saw fit to award a degree<br />
to an apparent illiterate.<br />
Ms. Pondexter’s learned international<br />
tweet-mentary, of course, followed a similarly<br />
thoughtful tweatise on Japan from<br />
erstwhile Aflac spokesman Gilbert<br />
Gottfried and another tweet by a Chrysler<br />
social media <strong>PR</strong> consultant that questioned,<br />
in most spicy language, the<br />
driving <strong>com</strong>petence of Detroiters.<br />
As a result of said tweets, Ms.<br />
Pondexter lost her reputation, Mr.<br />
Gottfried his Aflac gig, and the <strong>PR</strong><br />
consultant his job.<br />
And that’s the point.<br />
While Twitter might be great for rallying<br />
the populace and bringing down<br />
dictators, it can positively destroy you.<br />
Indeed, the reputational risk/reward<br />
ratio of tweeting for any individual inter-<br />
MAY 2011 WWW.ODWYER<strong>PR</strong>.COM<br />
ested in earning a living — including<br />
celebrities and sports stars and CEOs —<br />
is questionable. While a persuasive tweet<br />
might marginally assist a marketing<br />
effort, an errant tweet can ruin a<br />
reputation.<br />
The indisputable fact is that just<br />
because you are a Hollywood celebrity or<br />
a professional athlete or even the top<br />
executive in a major corporation doesn’t<br />
mean you’re all that bright or attuned to<br />
public sensibilities. And unless you’re<br />
Charlie Sheen, 50 Cent or some equivalent<br />
multi-millionaire sociopath, you<br />
need to think twice before tweeting.<br />
And “thinking twice” in terms of<br />
Twitter translates to the following:<br />
Have a reason to tweet.<br />
The top tweeters, based on followers<br />
are: Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber and<br />
Britney Spears.<br />
The latter is selling a <strong>com</strong>eback record<br />
album, the middle one is selling a documentary<br />
film, and the former is selling<br />
anything she can get her hands on —<br />
music, apparel, electronic equipment,<br />
you name it. (In fact, if you want to learn<br />
something about modern merchandising,<br />
look no further than the brazen bombshell.)<br />
The point is that these people are all<br />
“selling” something; they have a reason<br />
to tweet.<br />
They’re not doing it on a whim, e.g.<br />
defaming Detroit drivers or bashing the<br />
Japanese.<br />
Tweet as part of a larger plan.<br />
Twitter absolutely should be an element<br />
in a marketing/public relations plan.<br />
Smart <strong>com</strong>panies, like Starbucks coffee<br />
or Southwest airlines or Zappos<br />
shoes, use Twitter, along with Facebook<br />
and other traditional and social media<br />
tools, to boost their brands and sell their<br />
products.<br />
Similarly, smart celebrities, like Oprah<br />
and Shaq and Madonna (and even twonamed<br />
celebs) use Twitter as part of a<br />
larger strategic plan to boost their causes<br />
and themselves.<br />
With just 140 characters, Twitter is best<br />
used as an “enticer,” a “grabber,” a<br />
“catalyst,” not as a marketing or public<br />
relations end in and of itself.<br />
Use Twitter to break news.<br />
For big celebrities, Twitter as “news<br />
breaker” has be<strong>com</strong>e its most potent use.<br />
When Sarah Palin wants to jump into<br />
the Arizona gun debate or Lindsay Lohan<br />
wants to “apologize” in advance of a<br />
Professional Development<br />
court hearing or Lady Gaga wants to<br />
insert herself into the gays-in-themilitary<br />
debate — they do it on Twitter.<br />
Their <strong>PR</strong> people then issue releases<br />
pointing reporters to the tweet, and bingo,<br />
“instant news.”<br />
This, of course, is an admittedly calculated<br />
use of this seemingly “scriptless”<br />
medium, just as a news release or a<br />
speech or a media advisory is used to<br />
stimulate coverage.<br />
Which leads to this final suggestion:<br />
Seek help before tweeting.<br />
Of course, this is heresy to every redblooded<br />
social media supporter of spontaneity.<br />
To the zealots, “falsifying” tweets<br />
is the most egregious violation of<br />
Twitterquette. A Twitter “conversation,”<br />
they say, should be just that — real,<br />
unedited, and unscripted by a paid<br />
advisor. Anything less, they argue,<br />
destroys credibility.<br />
Oh you poor misguided saps.<br />
Not even Biz Stone (look him up!) is<br />
naive enough to think that Bill Gates or Al<br />
Gore or Martha Stewart or Shakira or<br />
Oprah — Oprah, for goddsakes! — actually<br />
have time to author all their own tweets.<br />
Public relations people get paid for<br />
advising clients on the strategy and implementation<br />
of their <strong>com</strong>munications<br />
weaponry — from releases and speeches<br />
to memos and presentations. Part of that<br />
21st century arsenal are blogs and<br />
podcasts, Facebook postings and tweets.<br />
And they, too, should be influenced by<br />
counselors expert in the fine art of<br />
strategic <strong>com</strong>munication.<br />
Here’s why:<br />
Designer Kenneth Cole was ostracized<br />
after tweeting that his new spring collection<br />
was inspired by the unrest in the<br />
Middle East.<br />
New York University deep-sixed a wellknown<br />
research Fellow after his insensitive<br />
(some would say, “insane”) tweet badmouthing<br />
a CBS broadcaster sexually<br />
assaulted in Cairo.<br />
The Indiana Attorney General was<br />
sacked for tweeting that the Wisconsin<br />
police should use live ammo to fight union<br />
protestors.<br />
And then, of course, there were Gilbert<br />
and Chrysler and Cappie.<br />
All would have benefited from wise<br />
public relations counsel — not to mention,<br />
robust editing — before tweeting their<br />
reputations away.<br />
Sorry Twitter nation.