BULETINUL INSTITUTULUI POLITEHNIC DIN IAŞI - Universitatea ...

Bul. Inst. Polit. Iaşi, t. LVI (LX), f. 2, 2010 239
Fig. 2 – Bloom’s Taxonomy [4].
This paper aims to structure a model in which cognitive elements of
Bloom’s taxonomy can be integrated with another model which is specific for
activities of a team with high innovative potential.
2. Case Analysis
From previous studies in the area of the self-managed team concept, situated
in a research environment from industrial engineering domain, resulted a model
of creative self-managed team. To define this model, we used the following
tools: General Innovation Skills Aptitude Test - GISAT [5], Belbin test to
determine the role in a team [2] and Building Blocks focused on variables of
effectiveness teams [13]. The model was developed on the most significant
correlations between subjects’ scores to the three dimensions: innovative
profile, team roles and team variables.
The scores obtained for subject (S3) identified as Monitor-Evaluator and
subject (S15) identified as Plant from the perspective of the roles assumption
correlate with the scores obtained for first pillar - Generating and Assessing
Ideas from the innovative profile and with the team variables: Openness and
Confrontation, Support and Trust, Cooperation and Conflict (see on Fig. 3, the
quadrant for S15, S3). The scores obtained for subject (S11) identified as
Implementer and subject (S16) identified as Shaper from the perspective of the
roles assumption correlate with the scores obtained for second pillar - Risk-
Taking from the innovative profile and with the team variables: Judicious
Procedures, Appropriate Leadership and Regular Review (see on Fig. 3, the