04.03.2013 Views

BULETINUL INSTITUTULUI POLITEHNIC DIN IAŞI - Universitatea ...

BULETINUL INSTITUTULUI POLITEHNIC DIN IAŞI - Universitatea ...

BULETINUL INSTITUTULUI POLITEHNIC DIN IAŞI - Universitatea ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

224 Dănuț Zahariea and Marius Stachie<br />

3. Comparative Analysis<br />

After a preliminary analysis, the clamped end of the bimetallic strip has<br />

been identified as being critical in terms of stresses. In order to improve the<br />

computational process the local changing of the mesh parameters at the clamped<br />

end is required. Thus, for the critical area the “Size” mesh parameter will be<br />

0.25. The global mesh parameters are „Size”=1 and „Sag”=0.5.<br />

The first set of comparative analyses is determining how the width of the<br />

beams influences the behavior of the bimetallic strip. Thus, for every<br />

combination of materials changing the width of the beams and maintaining<br />

constant the other parameters were obtained the numerical values for maximum<br />

deflection (Fig. 3a) and for the von Misses stress on the active layer (Fig. 3b),<br />

as well as for the passive layer (Fig. 3c).<br />

a<br />

b c<br />

Fig. 3 – The influence of the width of the beams:<br />

a – maximum deflection; b – von Misses stress for active layer;<br />

c – von Misses stress for passive layer.<br />

The second set of comparative analyses is determining how the length of the<br />

beams influences the behavior of the bimetallic strip. Thus, for every<br />

combination of materials changing the length of the beams and maintaining<br />

constant the other parameters were obtained the numerical values for maximum

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!