Apidra (insulin glulisine) - Sanofi Canada
Apidra (insulin glulisine) - Sanofi Canada
Apidra (insulin glulisine) - Sanofi Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
glargine followed by randomization. Glycemic control and the rates of hypoglycemia requiring<br />
intervention from a third party were comparable for the two treatment regimens. The number of<br />
daily <strong>insulin</strong> injections and the total daily doses of APIDRA and <strong>insulin</strong> lispro were similar. The<br />
decrease in A1c was observed in patients treated with APIDRA without an increase in the basal<br />
<strong>insulin</strong> dose (see Table 8).<br />
Table 8: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus–Adult<br />
Treatment duration<br />
Treatment in combination with following basal<br />
26 weeks<br />
LANTUS<br />
<strong>insulin</strong>:<br />
®<br />
(<strong>insulin</strong> glargine)<br />
APIDRA Insulin lispro<br />
Number of subjects treated<br />
A1c (%)<br />
339 333<br />
Endstudy mean 7.46 7.45<br />
Adjusted mean change from baseline -0.14 -0.14<br />
APIDRA – Insulin lispro 0.00<br />
95% CI for treatment difference<br />
Basal <strong>insulin</strong> dose (U/day)<br />
(-0.09; 0.10)<br />
Endstudy mean 24.16 26.43<br />
Adjusted mean change from baseline<br />
Short-acting <strong>insulin</strong> dose (U/day)<br />
0.12 1.82<br />
Endstudy mean 29.03 30.12<br />
Adjusted mean change from baseline<br />
Severe hypoglycemia*<br />
-1.07 -0.81<br />
Number of subjects (%) 16/335 (4.8) 13/326(4.0)<br />
Rate (events/month/patient) 0.02 0.02<br />
Mean number of short-acting <strong>insulin</strong> injections per<br />
3.36 3.42<br />
day<br />
* Events requiring assistance from third party during the last 3 months of the study<br />
CI = Confidence Interval<br />
Type 1 Diabetes-Pediatric:<br />
A 26-week phase III open-label, active controlled study (n=572) evaluated the efficacy and<br />
safety of APIDRA in children and adolescents with type I diabetes mellitus, in comparison with<br />
<strong>insulin</strong> lispro when administered subcutaneously within 15 minutes before a meal. LANTUS<br />
(<strong>insulin</strong> glargine) was administered once daily in the evening or NPH twice daily in the morning<br />
and in the evening as basal <strong>insulin</strong>. The study consisted of a 4-week run-in phase during which<br />
patients received NPH or <strong>insulin</strong> glargine combined with <strong>insulin</strong> lispro, followed by a 26-week<br />
treatment-phase comparing <strong>insulin</strong> <strong>glulisine</strong> and <strong>insulin</strong> lispro, given at least twice daily<br />
within15 minutes prior to a meal in combination with NPH <strong>insulin</strong> administered twice daily or<br />
<strong>insulin</strong> glargine administered once daily in the evening. Most patients were Caucasian (91%).<br />
Fifty percent of the patients were male. The mean age was 12.5 years (range 4 to 17 years).<br />
Mean BMI was 20.6 kg/m 2 . Glycemic control (see Table 9) was comparable for the two<br />
treatment regimens.<br />
Page 29 of 61