03.03.2013 Views

download catalogue high resolution pdf (22.3 mb) - Jens Haaning

download catalogue high resolution pdf (22.3 mb) - Jens Haaning

download catalogue high resolution pdf (22.3 mb) - Jens Haaning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

018, 019<br />

NBP<br />

P.102<br />

Nicolas Bourriaud, Paris<br />

JENS HAANING : ILLEGAL WORKER<br />

Style once used to be enough to define the identity of an artist. But in the<br />

contemporary world, identity is never much more than an access code, a logo (at<br />

best) or a sales pitch (at worst). Surveying a formal territory understood as a<br />

private property thus isn’t the issue anymore. The work of many artists today is<br />

carried out in a succession of aesthetic "moves" apparently isolated from one another.<br />

These operators produce exhibitions which are often very disparate formally, since<br />

they only consider forms as a tool, rather than an end for their work. Among them,<br />

one could name Maurizio Cattelan or Gianni Motti, Henrik Plenge Jakobsen,<br />

Kendell Geers, Matthieu Laurette, Christian Jankowski, Wim Delvoye and finally,<br />

<strong>Jens</strong> <strong>Haaning</strong>. Neither can their practice be described as "experimental" (i.e. this is<br />

not what makes it particular) since it is not rooted in the image of a studiocum-laboratory.<br />

Rather than investigating a given issue (through a vertical, drilling<br />

process), this type of practice unfolds on a horizontal line where recurring elements<br />

end up defining a personal universe, in other words a specific toolbox designed to process<br />

a similarly specific mass of information.<br />

With respect to this re-centering of aesthetics towards a mode where forms are<br />

instrumental, how can the quality of the works thus produced be measured? It is of<br />

course understood that the issue isn’t only whether a work functions or not; a lot of<br />

art that "functions well" turns out to be disastrous, or simply boring. The concept<br />

of "accuracy" seems more convincing. What, for want of a better word, one often<br />

calls the "beauty" of an artwork is only in most cases the translation in everyday<br />

language of a feeling of accuracy which strikes us: the adequate form to convey a<br />

singular vision of the world, a precise handling of one’s tools. Relevance in the current<br />

aesthetics debate, relevance in the period in which it arises. And potentially<br />

sustainable as well, if the various elements which "hold" it together persist in their<br />

association, which is not always the case, as the perusal of any <strong>catalogue</strong> from the<br />

‘80s would easily demonstrate.<br />

<strong>Jens</strong> <strong>Haaning</strong>’s artworks function, in real time moreover. They demand our<br />

participation, not from a theoretical point of view (as the notion of "participation"<br />

implied in 50s happenings), but in order to verify the concrete hypothesis they<br />

materialize. The travel agency he set up at the Chouakri gallery in Berlin delivered

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!