03.03.2013 Views

Aquatic Zoos - Captive Animals Protection Society

Aquatic Zoos - Captive Animals Protection Society

Aquatic Zoos - Captive Animals Protection Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

significantly change most of their procedures in the few years that have passed). If something this view<br />

of the inner working of public aquaria shows us that there are many animal health problems to<br />

encounter when running public aquaria, and death and disease occurs on a regular basis in them. Quite<br />

far from the image that visitors can experience when moving slowly under the underwater tunnel at the<br />

sound of a relaxing soft tune.<br />

Despite most of the health problems of captive fish going unnoticed by the general public, on some<br />

occasions the problems of a high profile aquarium inhabitant do make it to the press. For instance, in the<br />

year 2001, ozone problems in the main aquarium tank caused by equipment failure made the National<br />

Marine Aquarium in Plymouth loose four of their valuable sandbar sharks (Anonymous, 2001a), which<br />

was widely publicised.<br />

Sometimes the health problems do not originate in the public aquarium display, but in any of the other<br />

activities the aquarium is involved, such as during fish capture and transport. For instance, a previous<br />

batch of another four sandbar shark at the National Marine Aquarium also died in 1998 soon after arrival,<br />

probably killed by hypothermia after their flight to the aquarium was delayed (Anonymous, 2001a). This<br />

was not only an animal welfare tragedy, but had conservation implications since sandbar sharks in the<br />

wild travel from the Atlantic Ocean where they are obliterated by one fishery, to the Gulf of Mexico<br />

where they are caught by another. This means that, in addition to the captures for public aquarium<br />

displays, these shark populations are being hit twice, and because they grow very slowly (a 17 year old<br />

sandbar was found to be still immature, and it is considered that females do not mature until they are<br />

nearly 30 years old) their populations are slow to regain numbers and are therefore vulnerable to overfishing<br />

(Bright, 1999). In fact, the survival rate of sharks during transport is often not very impressive.<br />

Young et. al (2002) found that for the scalloped hammerhead shark it was 83% for Beijing aquarium,<br />

83% for the Oceanarium of Lisboa and 33% for the Rotterdam Zoo Oceanarium.<br />

The safe capture and transport of sharks present several challenges due to key features of shark<br />

anatomy and physiology. Important issues include risk of trauma, overexertion, hypoxia, circulatory<br />

compromise/collapse, hypoglycemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, and environmental accumulation<br />

of toxic metabolites leading to declining water quality. In addition to capture techniques, some of the<br />

factors contribute directly to a fatal exertional rhabdomyolysis syndrome or ‘capture myopathy’<br />

(Greenwell, 2003), also known as “over standing disease” for terrestrial animals (one of the most<br />

important causes of death in wild ungulates that are captured for translocation).<br />

Once in the aquarium many sharks do not survive for long, since they are very susceptible to bacteria<br />

and fungi infections (Bright, 1999; Grimes et al, 1884). For instance, 69% of the sharks kept at the<br />

National Aquarium of Baltimore between 1981 and 1988 died within a year, which was attributed to their<br />

inability to acclimatise. 103 mortalities occurred, and from the 71 sharks with a definite cause of death,<br />

51% died due to infections, 31% to trauma and 18% were euthanised (Hecker et al.1989).<br />

In other cases disease suffered in public aquaria may contribute to the extinction of threatened species.<br />

An example of this is the captive breeding programme to save the Charco Palma pupfish Cyprinodon<br />

longidorsalis, which was discovered in the early 1980’s and it is considered extinct in the wild since 1991.<br />

A captive population exists in one US institution, London zoo and in the London aquarium. However, fish<br />

tuberculosis (Mycobacterium) was discovered in the British captive population which led to the<br />

euthanasia of all the symptomatic fish, which in turn threatened the success of the captive breeding<br />

programme (Spinks, 2003). This is not an isolated case, because the presence of Mycobacterium<br />

infection in marine and freshwater fish kept in aquaria has been a continual problem for zoological<br />

collections (Nyaoke et al., 2000).<br />

Some species are more susceptible than others to the shortcomings of captive life, and therefore are<br />

more prone to illness and death. Cephalopods (octopuses, squid, cuttlefish and nautiluses), as seen in<br />

the reports above, seem to be a group of animals particularly affected by captivity. Octopuses are very<br />

sensitive to water quality and the tropical ones cannot survive without reef-quality water conditions<br />

(Haywood & Wells, 1989). Most are nocturnal and prefer subdued light, not always available in public<br />

aquaria for the visitors’ sake. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals, especially copper, are especially<br />

deadly to invertebrates. Octopuses are also extremely sensitive to low concentration of dissolved oxygen.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!