ca01 only detailed ToC 1..24

ca01 only detailed ToC 1..24 ca01 only detailed ToC 1..24

thieme.chemistry.com
from thieme.chemistry.com More from this publisher
02.03.2013 Views

46 Science of Synthesis 1.1 Organometallic Complexes of Nickel with CH 2Cl 2 (3 ” 35 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO 4). Removal of the drying agent through filtration, followed by solvent evaporation in vacuo, afforded a yellow oil. Chromatography (silica gel, hexanes/EtOAc 15:1) afforded 38 as a colorless oil; yield: 69 mg (73%). 1.1.2.7.2 Variation2: Enal-Derived ð-Allyl Complexes Enal-derived nickel–ð-allyl complexes are efficient partners in cross-coupling reactions with alkenyl- and arylstannanes leading to products such as 39 (Scheme 23). [39] As described for the allylic ether derived complexes, the mechanism of the coupling process involves transmetalation followed by reductive elimination. The reaction is catalytic in nickel, unlike couplings of enals with alkyl halides which require stoichiometric quantities of nickel. Many other variants of nickel-catalyzed conjugate additions may involve ðallyl complexes, but these are treated separately in a section on alkenes (Section 1.1.4.2) because the mechanism is poorly defined in most nickel-catalyzed conjugate additions. Scheme 23 Addition of Organotins to Enal-Derived ð-Allyl Complexes [39] H O Bu3SnCH CH2 TBDMSCl, Ni(cod)2 2 TBDMSO Cl Ni Ni Cl 75% OTBDMS 39 OTBDMS (E)-1-(tert-Butyldimethylsiloxy)penta-1,4-diene (39): [39] A 25-mL Schlenk tube equipped with a stirring bar was sequentially charged with propenal (74.0 ìL, 1.11 mmol), (MeO)(TMSO)C=CMe 2 (30.0 mg, 0.148mmol), TBDMSCl (168mg, 1.12 mmol), and CH 2Cl 2 (1.5 mL). The soln was stirred for 5 min, treated with [Ni(cod) 2](2; 27 mg, 0.098mmol), stirred for an additional 5 min, and then treated with tributyl(vinyl)stannane (293 ìL, 1.00 mmol) to give a clear red soln. This was stirred at 258C for 48h, near the end of which time the mixture turned black and deposited a metallic nickel precipitate. The mixture was diluted with pentane (25 mL) and washed with aq 0.1 M KH 2PO 4/NaOH buffer (2 ” 25 mL, pH 7). The organic layer was separated and the product was dried (MgSO 4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure (15 Torr) to afford an oil [(E/Z) 19:1] which was chromatographed (silica gel, 35 g, hexane/EtOAc 98:2) to give 39 as a clear, colorless oil; yield: 149 mg (75%); (E/Z) > 50:1 by 1 H NMR analysis. 1.1.2.7.3 Variation3: Allylic Alcohol Derived ð-Allyl Complexes Allylic alcohols readily undergo nickel-catalyzed allylation with Grignard reagents (Scheme 24). [52–55] Both isomers of 40 produce similar product ratios, and the reaction presumably proceeds via nickel–ð-allyl intermediates. Only simple Grignard reagents that lack â-hydrogens such as methylmagnesium bromide and phenylmagnesium bromide are reported, but considerable variation of the allylic alcohol is tolerated.

1.1.2 Nickel–Allyl Complexes 47 Scheme 24 Addition of Grignard Reagents to Allylic Alcohols [52–55] MeMgBr, NiCl2(PPh3) 2 3 Bu + 50% OH t But But 40 41 4:1 42 4-tert-Butyl-1-methyl-1-vinylcyclohexane (41): [52] A 0.74 M soln of MeMgBr in Et 2O (35 mL) was distilled under N 2 nearly to dryness, and dry benzene (20 mL), NiCl 2(PPh 3) 2 (3; 417 mg), and a soln of a 5:3 mixture of cis- and trans-isomers of 40 (1.00 g, 5.5 mmol) in dry benzene (15 mL) were added successively. The mixture was heated at reflux under N 2 for 24 h, and sat. NH 4Cl soln (25 mL) was added. The organic layer was washed with H 2O, dried (Na 2SO 4), and evaporated. Distillation of the residue afforded a 77:20 mixture of 41 and 42; yield: 500 mg (50%); bp 93–988C/16 Torr, accompanied by a 3% yield of the diastereomer of 41. 1.1.2.8 Method 8: Additionof Stabilized Nucleophiles to Nickel–Allyl Complexes The allylic alkylation with weak nucleophiles employing nickel catalysts is generally not as efficient as the corresponding palladium-catalyzed methods. However, allylic acetates, allyl phenyl ethers, and allylic carbonates undergo efficient couplings with amines, phenols, and malonates in the presence of nickel(0) catalysts (Scheme 25). [56,57] Scheme 25 Addition of Weak Nucleophiles to Allylic Acetates, Carbonates, and Ethers [56,57] OR 1 + NuH R1 = Ac, Ph, CO2Me Nu = NEt2, OPh, CH(CO2R2 ) 2 Ni(dppe)2 Nu 1.1.2.9 Method 9: Alkyne Insertions with Nickel–Allyl Complexes Migratory insertion of an alkyne into a nickel–ð-allyl complex has not been rigorously established. However, this mechanistic scenario has been postulated in several synthetically useful processes. Ikeda has demonstrated that treatment of a mixture of allyl chlorides, terminal alkynes, and alkynyltin reagents with catalytic amounts of nickel(0) without phosphine leads to the production of conjugated enynes (e.g., 43; Scheme 26). [58–60] Whereas couplings with allyl chlorides proceed in high yield, the analogous procedure with allyl acetates and allyl carbonates is less efficient. Interestingly, reactions carried out in the presence of triphenylphosphine afford the product derived from direct coupling of the allyl chloride and alkynyltin. [60] Both inter- and intramolecular variants are quite general. for references see p 79

1.1.2 Nickel–Allyl Complexes 47<br />

Scheme 24 Addition of Grignard Reagents to Allylic Alcohols [52–55]<br />

MeMgBr, NiCl2(PPh3) 2 3<br />

Bu +<br />

50%<br />

OH<br />

t But But 40<br />

41 4:1<br />

42<br />

4-tert-Butyl-1-methyl-1-vinylcyclohexane (41): [52]<br />

A 0.74 M soln of MeMgBr in Et 2O (35 mL) was distilled under N 2 nearly to dryness, and dry<br />

benzene (20 mL), NiCl 2(PPh 3) 2 (3; 417 mg), and a soln of a 5:3 mixture of cis- and trans-isomers<br />

of 40 (1.00 g, 5.5 mmol) in dry benzene (15 mL) were added successively. The mixture<br />

was heated at reflux under N 2 for 24 h, and sat. NH 4Cl soln (25 mL) was added. The<br />

organic layer was washed with H 2O, dried (Na 2SO 4), and evaporated. Distillation of the residue<br />

afforded a 77:20 mixture of 41 and 42; yield: 500 mg (50%); bp 93–988C/16 Torr, accompanied<br />

by a 3% yield of the diastereomer of 41.<br />

1.1.2.8 Method 8:<br />

Additionof Stabilized Nucleophiles to Nickel–Allyl Complexes<br />

The allylic alkylation with weak nucleophiles employing nickel catalysts is generally not<br />

as efficient as the corresponding palladium-catalyzed methods. However, allylic acetates,<br />

allyl phenyl ethers, and allylic carbonates undergo efficient couplings with amines, phenols,<br />

and malonates in the presence of nickel(0) catalysts (Scheme 25). [56,57]<br />

Scheme 25 Addition of Weak Nucleophiles to Allylic<br />

Acetates, Carbonates, and Ethers [56,57]<br />

OR 1<br />

+<br />

NuH<br />

R1 = Ac, Ph, CO2Me Nu = NEt2, OPh, CH(CO2R2 ) 2<br />

Ni(dppe)2 Nu<br />

1.1.2.9 Method 9:<br />

Alkyne Insertions with Nickel–Allyl Complexes<br />

Migratory insertion of an alkyne into a nickel–ð-allyl complex has not been rigorously established.<br />

However, this mechanistic scenario has been postulated in several synthetically<br />

useful processes. Ikeda has demonstrated that treatment of a mixture of allyl chlorides,<br />

terminal alkynes, and alkynyltin reagents with catalytic amounts of nickel(0) without<br />

phosphine leads to the production of conjugated enynes (e.g., 43; Scheme 26). [58–60]<br />

Whereas couplings with allyl chlorides proceed in high yield, the analogous procedure<br />

with allyl acetates and allyl carbonates is less efficient. Interestingly, reactions carried<br />

out in the presence of triphenylphosphine afford the product derived from direct coupling<br />

of the allyl chloride and alkynyltin. [60] Both inter- and intramolecular variants are<br />

quite general.<br />

for references see p 79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!