Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44 Science of Synthesis 1.1 Organometallic Complexes of Nickel<br />
pH 7), and shaken to give an emulsion that was filtered with suction through Celite to<br />
achieve separation. The organic phase was washed with H 2O (3 ” 300 mL), dried (MgSO 4),<br />
filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure (15 Torr) to afford a mixture of 34 and<br />
cycloocta-1,5-diene. Distillation through a 20-cm Vigreux column under reduced pressure<br />
afforded 34 as a clear, colorless oil; yield: 3.62 g (72%); bp 80–82 8C/3 Torr.<br />
1.1.2.7 Method 7:<br />
Coupling of Nickel–Allyl Complexes with Main Group Organometallics<br />
Nickel–ð-allyl complexes generated by a variety of methods undergo efficient coupling<br />
with nonstabilized main group organometallic reagents. Magnesium reagents have been<br />
most extensively investigated as the main group organometallic, [43] although organostannanes<br />
[39] and organoborates [44] have also been reported to participate in catalytic allylations.<br />
In some instances, efficient allylic reductions may be observed if the main group<br />
organometallic possesses a â-hydrogen. The mechanism typically proceeds by oxidative<br />
addition to afford the nickel–ð-allyl complex, transmetalation of the main group organometallic<br />
to produce an alkyl/allylnickel species, and reductive elimination to afford the<br />
coupled product (Scheme 20). The reductive elimination step has been studied in detail<br />
by Kurosawa who demonstrated that the rate of reductive elimination from an 18-electron<br />
(ç 3 -allyl)nickel complex is significantly greater than reductive elimination from either<br />
the ç 3 or ç 1 16-electron complexes. [45,46] Although nickel(0) and nickel(II) complexes<br />
are comm<strong>only</strong> invoked in this reaction class, the involvement of paramagnetic nickel<br />
species is well documented in related reaction classes and cannot be ruled out here.<br />
Scheme 20 Nickel-Catalyzed Allylation of Allylic Ethers and Enals [39,43,44]<br />
allylic ether or enal<br />
M = main group metal<br />
+<br />
NiLn 1.1.2.7.1 Variation1:<br />
Allylic Ether Derived ð-Allyl Complexes<br />
In contrast to the very widely used palladium-catalyzed allylations involving allylic acetates,<br />
the corresponding nickel-catalyzed reactions comm<strong>only</strong> employ allylic ethers. The<br />
nickel-catalyzed allylation of main group organometallics normally favors the more-substituted<br />
regioisomer, and the reaction proceeds with overall inversion of configuration of<br />
the allylic ether (e.g., 35 fi 36; Scheme 21). [43] Hoveyda has demonstrated that substratedirected<br />
alkylations are possible by employing allylic ethers such as 37 with a tethered<br />
phosphine moiety. [47,48] Phosphine-containing substrates direct alkylation to the distal position<br />
of the allyl unit, giving products such as 38. Reductions employing ethylmagnesium<br />
bromide, however, are directed to the proximal position of the allyl unit (Scheme<br />
21). [49] Several asymmetric variants of allylations of Grignard reagents are utilized in relatively<br />
simple systems (Scheme 22). Interestingly, whereas the Hoveyda studies on directed<br />
reductions lead cleanly to hydrogen-atom incorporation in the presence of ethylmagnesium<br />
bromide and dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II) (3), [49] the asymmetric variants<br />
with chiral chelating phosphines give high yields of ethyl-group incorporation<br />
with ethylmagnesium bromide. [50,51] Related additions to unsaturated acetals are discussed<br />
in Section 1.1.4.9.<br />
R 1 M<br />
R 1<br />
NiL n<br />
R 1