02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Variants of SMART 53<br />

then the model is not requisite – it is not yet sufficient to solve the problem.<br />

The model can be considered requisite only when no new intuitions emerge<br />

about the problem.<br />

Thus the requisite modeling process does not attempt to obtain an exact<br />

representation of the decision maker’s beliefs and preferences, or to<br />

prescribe an optimal solution to his problem. However, by exploiting<br />

the conflicts between the results of the analysis and his intuitive judgments<br />

it will help him to resolve conflicts and inconsistencies in his<br />

thinking. As a deeper understanding of the problem is obtained the<br />

model will be revised and the discrepancy between the analytical and<br />

intuitive judgments will be reduced. Eventually, the decision maker<br />

will find that the model provides enough guidance for him to reach<br />

a decision.<br />

Variants of SMART<br />

Value-focused thinking<br />

Earlier we set out the process of applying SMART as a series of stages.<br />

Although we emphasized that the application of the method is not a<br />

linear process through these stages – decision makers will move backwards<br />

and forwards through the stages as they learn more about their<br />

decision problem – the order of the stages we presented implies what<br />

is known as ‘alternative-focused thinking’. We identify the alternative<br />

courses of action (stage 2) before we determine the relevant attributes<br />

(stage 3). Keeney 14 has proposed an approach that he calls ‘valuefocused<br />

thinking’, which essentially involves a reversal of these two<br />

stages. In this approach you first determine your ‘values’ – that is what<br />

objectives (and hence what attributes) are important to you. Only then<br />

do you create alternatives that might help you to achieve these objectives.<br />

These alternatives are then evaluated in the same way as for<br />

alternative-focused thinking. Keeney’s approach is worth considering<br />

for major strategic or life-changing decisions where there is a need to<br />

think deeply about what you want to achieve in life or what the fundamental<br />

values of an organization are. Such decisions imply a need<br />

to ‘think outside the box’. However, we think that value-focused thinking<br />

needs more development before it can provide effective support<br />

for identifying these fundamental values and objectives. 15 Suggestions<br />

that you should ask yourself ‘what would you like to achieve in this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!