02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Statistical models of judgment 447<br />

market – such that insurance products are transformed from commodity<br />

items to customized, value-added, services. The authors argue that<br />

expert systems can aid underwriters to segment client groupings.<br />

In summary, a strong business case can be made for automating<br />

an expert underwriter’s decision-making processes and utilizing the<br />

resulting expert system at an early phase of back-office transaction<br />

processing. In addition, advice-giving systems at front-office point-ofsale<br />

can enhance the sale capabilities of front-office financial services<br />

staff. Such advice-giving systems also enable the collection of detailed<br />

customer profiles.<br />

Compared to such exemplar systems, more generalized advice-giving<br />

systems which are intended to stimulate strategic thinking or negotiation<br />

seem less utilitarian.<br />

Statistical models of judgment<br />

One of the major databases used for early experimentation on multiattributed<br />

inference has been that collected by Meehl. 38 The judgmental<br />

problem used was that of differentiating psychotic from neurotic patients<br />

on the basis of their MMPI questionnaire profiles.<br />

Each patient, upon being admitted to hospital, had taken the MMPI.<br />

Expert clinical psychologists believe (or at least used to believe) that<br />

they can differentiate between psychotics and neurotics on the basis of a<br />

profile of the 11 scores. Meehl noted that<br />

because the differences between psychotic and neurotic profile are considered<br />

in MMPI lore to be highly configural in character, an atomistic treatment by<br />

combining scales linearly should be theoretically a very poor substitute for<br />

the configural approach.<br />

Initially, researchers tried to ‘capture’ or ‘model’ expert judges by a<br />

simple linear regression equation. These judgmental representations are<br />

constructed in the following way. The clinician is asked to make his<br />

diagnostic or prognostic judgment from a previously quantified set of<br />

cues for each of a large number of patients. These judgments are then<br />

used as the dependent variable in a standard linear regression analysis.<br />

The independent variables in this analysis are the values of the cues. The<br />

results of such an analysis are a set of regression weights, one for each<br />

cue, and these sets of regression weights are referred to as the judge’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!