02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Illustrative case study 403<br />

(b) Attach a weight of 100 to the most important swing and<br />

measure the importance of other swings on this scale.<br />

Normalize the weights so that they sum to one.<br />

Stage 8: For each strategy/scenario combination use the attribute<br />

scores and weights to determine a weighted aggregate score.<br />

Stage 9: Use the matrix of strategy/scenario aggregate scores to assess<br />

and compare the strategies’ performance, paying particular<br />

attention to the robustness of performance over the range<br />

of scenarios.<br />

Stage 10: Perform sensitivity analysis.<br />

While the approach is very similar to SMART (see Chapter 3), a crucial<br />

difference is the ordering of the stages of the analysis. The alternative<br />

strategies are not considered until the plausible scenarios have been<br />

formulated and the objectives determined. This latter deviation from<br />

SMART reflects Keeney’s concern 10 that objectives should be identified<br />

before alternatives since this is more likely to facilitate the design of<br />

imaginative options and identification of new opportunities. We next<br />

use a simplified case study to demonstrate the approach. Note that, in<br />

practice, switching backwards and forwards between the stages is likely<br />

as an increased understanding of the problem develops.<br />

Illustrative case study<br />

This case study concerns a newly privatized national mail company<br />

which needs to formulate strategies with a 10-year planning horizon.<br />

To date, the company has been protected by legislation which allows<br />

it to operate as a monopoly on letter deliveries. This protection has<br />

engendered a culture of muddling through (i.e. minor adjustments to<br />

policies in reaction to events, with no clear sense of overall direction).<br />

However, the environment within which the company may operate in<br />

the future is likely to change fundamentally. For example, there is a<br />

possibility that it will lose its monopoly position, while technological<br />

developments pose long-term threats to the volume of letter mail.<br />

Stage 1 Formulate scenarios<br />

For simplicity, only two ‘extreme-world’ scenarios will be used here.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!