02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The main stages of the analysis 341<br />

Benefits<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Efficient frontier<br />

C<br />

1<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />

Costs ($m)<br />

Figure 13.5 – Identifying the efficient frontier for the furniture company problem<br />

B<br />

a continuous straight line or it will have the ‘convex’ shape shown in<br />

Figure 13.5, so that packages 1 and 2 will be excluded.<br />

It can be seen from Figure 13.5 that the proposed package (represented<br />

by P) did not lie on the efficient frontier. When this is the case, the<br />

EQUITY package highlights two alternative packages. Package B is a<br />

package which will offer the ‘best’ level of benefits for a cost which is<br />

close to that of the proposed package, while package C is a package<br />

which will offer roughly the same level of benefits as the proposed<br />

package, but at the ‘cheapest’ level of costs.<br />

Not surprisingly, the group of managers were interested in finding out<br />

about package B and the EQUITY program revealed that this involved<br />

the following strategies:<br />

In the North: Maintain the status quo<br />

In the West: Expand to six outlets<br />

In the East: Maintain the status quo<br />

In the South: Expand to 16 outlets<br />

This package would cost $71 million, which was less than the proposed<br />

package but would lead to benefits which had a value of 84.7, which<br />

P<br />

2<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!