02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Heuristics used for decisions involving multiple objectives 17<br />

option is chosen. For example, suppose that a manager has to choose<br />

between two competing products, but he or she has not got the time<br />

or motivation to search for all the details relating to the products. If<br />

the manager recognizes the name of the manufacturer of one of them,<br />

but not the other, then they may simply choose the product whose<br />

manufacturer they recognize. This simple heuristic is likely to work well<br />

in environments where quality is associated with ease of recognition. It<br />

may be that a more easily recognized manufacturer is likely to have been<br />

trading for longer and be larger. Its long-term survival and size may be<br />

evidence of its ability to produce quality products and to maintain its<br />

reputation. Interestingly, the recognition heuristic can reward ignorance.<br />

A more knowledgeable person might recognize both manufacturers and<br />

therefore be unable to employ the heuristic. If ease of recognition is an<br />

excellent predictor of quality then a less knowledgeable person who<br />

recognizes only one manufacturer will have the advantage. Of course,<br />

the heuristic will not work well when ease of recognition is not associated<br />

with how good an option is.<br />

The minimalist strategy 2<br />

In this heuristic the decision maker first applies the recognition heuristic,<br />

but if neither option is recognized the person will simply guess which<br />

is the best option. In the event of both options being recognized then<br />

the person will pick at random one of the attributes of the two options.<br />

If this attribute enables the person to discriminate between the two<br />

options they will make the decision at this point. If not, then they will<br />

pick a second attribute at random, and so on. For example, in choosing<br />

between two digital cameras, both of which have manufacturers which<br />

are recognized by the decision maker, the attribute ‘possession of movie<br />

shooting modes’ may be selected randomly. If only one camera has this<br />

facility then it will be selected, otherwise a second randomly selected<br />

attribute will be considered.<br />

Take the last 2<br />

This is the same as the minimalist heuristic except that people recall<br />

the attribute that enabled them to reach a decision last time when they<br />

had a similar choice to make. If this attribute does not allow them<br />

to discriminate between the options this time then they will choose the<br />

attribute that worked the time before, and so on. If none of the previously<br />

used attributes works, then a random attribute will be tried.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!