02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

290 Methods for eliciting probabilities<br />

Assessing probabilities for very rare events<br />

Assessment techniques that differ from those we have so far discussed<br />

are generally required when probabilities for very rare events have to<br />

be assessed. Such events are often of interest because of the disastrous<br />

consequences which may be associated with their occurrence. The catastrophic<br />

failure of a nuclear power plant, the collapse of a dam or the<br />

release of toxic fumes from a chemical factory are obvious examples of<br />

this event.<br />

Because of the rarity of such events, there is usually little or no<br />

reliable past data which can support a relative frequency approach to<br />

the probability assessment, and subjective estimates may be subject<br />

to biases which result from the use of the availability heuristic. For<br />

example, it may be easy to imagine circumstances which would lead<br />

to the event occurring even though these circumstances are extremely<br />

improbable. Moreover, as von Winterfeldt and Edwards 18 point out, rare<br />

events are newsworthy almost by definition, and widespread reports<br />

of their occurrence may have the effect of intensifying the availability<br />

bias. Decision makers are also likely to have problems in conceiving<br />

the magnitudes involved in the probability assessment. It is difficult to<br />

distinguish between probabilities such as 0.0001 and 0.000001, yet the<br />

first probability is a hundred times greater than the second.<br />

Obviously, a probability wheel would be of little use in assessing<br />

probabilities like these. There are, however, a number of ways in which<br />

the problems of assessing very low probabilities can be tackled. Event<br />

trees and fault trees allow the problem to be decomposed so that the<br />

combinations of factors which may cause the rare event to occur can be<br />

identified. Each of the individual factors may have a relatively high (and<br />

therefore more easily assessed) probability of occurrence. A log-odds<br />

scale allows the individual to discriminate more clearly between very<br />

low probabilities. We will examine each of these approaches below.<br />

Event trees<br />

Event trees are the same as the probability trees which we met in<br />

Chapter 4. Figure 10.4 shows a simplified tree for a catastrophic failure<br />

at an industrial plant. Each stage of the tree represents a factor which<br />

might, in combination with others, lead to the catastrophe. Rather than<br />

being asked to perform the difficult task of directly estimating the<br />

probability of catastrophic failure, the decision maker is asked instead

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!