02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

266 Biases in probability assessment<br />

situations sales do not continue to increase at the same rate; instead the<br />

rate of increase lessens as the market ceiling is approached.<br />

4. Subjects may be poorly motivated<br />

As we indicated earlier, many psychological studies have involved<br />

undergraduates as subjects. Where these subjects lacked expertise relating<br />

to the experimental task, this may also have affected motivation. As<br />

Beach et al. point out, the effort which subjects are prepared to invest in<br />

a judgmental task is likely to be reduced if the task is not perceived to be<br />

within their own particular area of expertise. Also, the absence of actual<br />

or potential users of probability judgments made in the laboratory may<br />

serve to reduce motivation. 24 Moreover, in many studies there were no<br />

rewards for good judgment so that there may have been little incentive to<br />

reflect deeply on the task. This is unlikely to be the case in a real decision<br />

where your income, reputation, job or even your life may depend upon<br />

the quality of your judgments.<br />

5. Citation bias<br />

Beach et al. 19 identified what they termed a ‘citation bias’ in the psychological<br />

literature. Of the 3500 articles on judgment and reasoning<br />

published between 1972 and 1981 only 84 were empirical studies. Of<br />

these, 47 reported poor performance and 37 found good performance.<br />

However, poor performance results were cited by authors on average<br />

six times more often than were results showing good performance.<br />

6. Real-world studies suggest better performance<br />

Relatively little research has focused on probability judgments made in<br />

real decisions. The most extensive studies have been carried out on the<br />

judgmental probability forecasts made by the National Weather Service<br />

in the United States. Murphy and colleagues 24 have evaluated these<br />

probabilities and found that, for certain categories of weather, they were<br />

more accurate than the available objective statistical techniques (accuracy<br />

here is measured by the calibration of the probabilities, see Chapter 10,<br />

and by special scoring rules 25 ). In this case, the forecasters have a<br />

very large amount of information available, including the output from<br />

statistical techniques. They also receive detailed feedback and have an<br />

opportunity to gain experience of making forecasts over a wide range of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!