02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The anchoring and adjustment heuristic 259<br />

Often these estimates start with an initial value which is then adjusted<br />

to obtain the final estimate. Typical initial values might be how long the<br />

last job took to complete or this month’s level of sales. Unfortunately, the<br />

adjustment from these initial values is often insufficient; a phenomenon<br />

known as anchoring. We investigate the effects of this next.<br />

Biases associated with anchoring and adjustment<br />

1. Insufficient adjustment<br />

Tversky and Kahneman demonstrated the anchoring effect in an experiment<br />

in which subjects were asked to estimate various quantities, such<br />

as the percentage of African nations who were members of the United<br />

Nations. Before the estimate was elicited, a wheel of fortune was spun<br />

to generate a random number between 0 and 100 and the subjects were<br />

asked whether the required percentage was above or below the generated<br />

number. They were then asked to make their estimate by moving<br />

upwards or downwards from the random number. Remarkably, the<br />

random number had a substantial effect on subjects’ estimates, with<br />

lower estimates being associated with lower random numbers. Later<br />

studies 9 have shown that even ridiculously extreme anchors can still<br />

exert an effect (for example, one study asked subjects whether the mean<br />

temperature in San Francisco was higher or lower than 558 degrees).<br />

In decision making, anchoring can be a problem in the estimation of<br />

costs, payoffs and probabilities. Forecasts that are used in the decision<br />

process may be biased by forecasters anchoring on the current value and<br />

making insufficient adjustment for the effect of future conditions.<br />

Test your judgment: answer to question 11<br />

This question tried to tempt you to anchor on Turkmenistan’s population<br />

of 3.7 million. Did it succeed?<br />

Q11. Uzbekistan’s population in 1990 was 20.7 million.<br />

2. Overestimating the probability of conjunctive events<br />

As we saw earlier, the co-occurrence of events is referred to as a<br />

conjunctive event. Typical examples might be: ‘the main machine and the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!