02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary 205<br />

Hull 10 ), some of them assuming that the shape of the dependent variable’s<br />

probability distribution is the same, whatever the value of the<br />

independent variable.<br />

The @RISK (pronounced ‘at risk’) computer package (also see next<br />

section) requires the user to input a correlation coefficient to show the<br />

strength of association between the two variables. This coefficient always<br />

has a value between −1 and+1. Positive values indicate that higher<br />

values of one variable are associated with higher values of the other (e.g.<br />

higher production levels are likely to be associated with higher machine<br />

maintenance costs). Negative coefficients imply an inverse relationship<br />

(e.g. higher advertising expenditure by competitors is associated with<br />

lower sales for our company). The closer the coefficient is to either −1or<br />

+1 then the stronger is the association.<br />

In practice, it may be possible to determine the appropriate correlation<br />

coefficient for the simulation model by analyzing past data. Where this<br />

is not possible the correlation can be estimated judgmentally. However,<br />

this needs to be done with care since, as we will see in Chapter 9, biases<br />

can occur in the assessment of covariation. In particular, prior beliefs<br />

and expectations can lead people to see associations where none exist, or<br />

to overestimate the degree of association when it is weak. Conversely,<br />

if the judgment is based on observations with no expectation of an<br />

association, then moderately strong associations that do exist are likely<br />

to be missed, while correlations for strong associations are likely to be<br />

underestimated. 11<br />

Summary<br />

In this chapter we have shown that simulation can be a powerful<br />

tool when the direct calculation of probabilities in a decision problem<br />

would be extremely complex. Moreover, because the approach<br />

does not involve advanced mathematics the methods involved and the<br />

results of analyses are accessible to decision makers who are not trained<br />

mathematicians or statisticians. Obviously, the application of simulation<br />

requires the use of a computer and a number of specialist computer<br />

packages are available. Perhaps the best known is @RISK (developed<br />

by the Palisade Corporation, Newfield, New York) which runs with<br />

Microsoft® Excel.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!