02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170 Decision trees and influence diagrams<br />

If the modification has still not led to completion after the further<br />

2 years a decision would then have to be made between switching<br />

to the HMP acid approach or persevering with zylogen for a further<br />

7 years, by which time it is assumed that successful development is<br />

certain to have been achieved.<br />

Assuming that the objective of Bonsante’s directors is to minimize<br />

the expected development time of the drug, determine their<br />

optimum policy.<br />

(7) The Casti engineering company manufactures specialized components<br />

for agricultural machinery. The moving parts of one of these<br />

components needs to be protected by applying a waterproof seal to<br />

its surface. Recently two new technologies have become available,<br />

which it is thought could replace the existing method and yield<br />

cost savings which would give Casti a significant advantage over<br />

competitors. The company now has to decide which technology,<br />

if any, it should develop (resource constraints mean that only one<br />

technology can be developed at any one time).<br />

The first technology is a patented method called KVG electrosealing.<br />

It is thought that there is a 0.8 probability that this<br />

technology could successfully be applied to the sealing process.<br />

The cost of developing this technology is estimated to be $8 million<br />

and a successful development would lead to gross savings (i.e.<br />

savings before development costs have been taken into account)<br />

of $19 million with a probability of 0.1, $12 million with a probability<br />

of 0.5 and $9 million with a probability of 0.4. If the process<br />

could not be made to work successfully then the company would<br />

abandon the project and continue with the existing method of<br />

sealing.<br />

The second technology would involve dipping the components<br />

in a solution of TCX. Developing this technology would cost an<br />

estimated $2 million, but it is thought that there is only a 0.65<br />

probability that the process could be designed to meet EC pollution<br />

standards. If pollution standards can be met then the process<br />

will lead to gross savings estimated to be worth $8 million. If the<br />

standards cannot be met then the company would have three<br />

options. Either it could abandon the entire project, or it could<br />

attempt to modify the method or it could switch its resources in<br />

an attempt to develop the KVG electro-sealing instead. Modifying<br />

the TCX dipping procedure would be likely to cost a further<br />

$2 million and it is thought that there would be a 50:50 chance<br />

that the modification would succeed. In the event of modification

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!