02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Decision trees and utility 149<br />

successful, and so on. Moreover, if the company chooses to develop<br />

its knowledge of gas, rather than electric, technology, this may restrict<br />

its options in the long term. However, any attempt to formulate a tree<br />

which represents every possible consequence and decision which may<br />

arise over a period stretching into the distant future would clearly lead<br />

to a model which was so complex that it would be intractable. Judgment<br />

is therefore needed to determine where the tree should end.<br />

Clearly, the calculations involved in analyzing a large decision tree can<br />

be rather tedious. Because of this, a number of computer packages have<br />

been developed which will display and analyze decision trees and allow<br />

them to be easily modified. For example, DPL, produced by Standard &<br />

Poor’s Applied Decision Analysis (ADA) (Menlo Park, California), is a<br />

Microsoft® Windows® application, while PRECISION TREE, produced<br />

by the Palisade Corporation (Newfield, New York), allows decision<br />

trees to be developed in Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Both packages<br />

also allow users to draw influence diagrams to represent the decision<br />

(see later in this chapter) and then to convert these automatically into<br />

decision trees.<br />

Decision trees and utility<br />

In the previous section we made the assumption that the decision maker<br />

was neutral to risk. Let us now suppose that the engineer is concerned<br />

that his career prospects will be blighted if the development of the<br />

processor leads to a great loss of money for the company. He is therefore<br />

risk averse, and his utility function for the monetary sums involved in<br />

this problem is shown in Figure 6.4.<br />

The procedure for analyzing the tree when utilities are involved is<br />

exactly the same as that which we used for the EMV criterion. Figure 6.5<br />

shows the decision tree, with the utilities replacing the monetary values.<br />

After applying the rollback method it can be seen that now the optimum<br />

policy is to develop the electric-powered design and, if it fails, to abandon<br />

the project. Note, however, that the closeness of the expected utilities<br />

suggests that sensitivity analysis should be applied to the tree before a<br />

firm decision is made.<br />

If the engineer had wished to include other attributes besides money<br />

in his decision model then multi-attribute utilities would have appeared<br />

at the ends of the tree. However, the rollback procedure would still have<br />

been applied in the same way. This would also be the case if the payoffs<br />

on the tree had been represented as net present values (see Chapter 7).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!