02.03.2013 Views

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

Downloadable - About University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130 Decision making under uncertainty<br />

Expected<br />

utility = 0.757<br />

Work normally<br />

Hire extra labor, etc.<br />

Expected<br />

utility = 0.872<br />

0.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.3<br />

0.8<br />

0.2<br />

Overrun<br />

time<br />

0 weeks<br />

3 weeks<br />

6 weeks<br />

Project<br />

cost<br />

$50000<br />

$60000<br />

$80000<br />

0 weeks $120000<br />

1 week $140000<br />

Figure 5.21 – The project manager’s decision tree with utilities<br />

Utility<br />

1.0<br />

0.8256<br />

0.54<br />

0.91<br />

0.72<br />

u(3 weeks overrun) = 0.6 and u($60 000 cost) = 0.96. Therefore:<br />

u(3 weeks overrun, $60 000 cost)<br />

= 0.8 u(3 weeks overrun) + 0.6 u($60 000 cost)<br />

− 0.4 u(3 weeks overrun)u($60 000 cost)<br />

= 0.8(0.6) + 0.6(0.96) − 0.4(0.6)(0.96) = 0.8256<br />

Figure 5.21 shows the decision tree again with the multi-attribute<br />

utilities replacing the original attribute values. By multiplying the probabilities<br />

of the outcomes by their utilities we obtain the expected utility<br />

of each option. The results shown on the tree indicate that the project<br />

manager should hire the extra labor and operate 24-hour working, as<br />

this yields the highest expected utility.<br />

Stage 3<br />

It is important that we should check that the results of the analysis<br />

have faithfully represented the project manager’s preferences. This can<br />

involve tracking back through the analysis and explaining why one

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!