02.03.2013 Views

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gene Networks 53<br />

Bayesian network with moving boxcel median filtering to capture such interactions.<br />

8. Imoto et al. (29) provided a general framework to combine microarray data <strong>and</strong><br />

various types of biological data aimed at estimating gene networks. Tamada et al. (30)<br />

used promoter elements detection method together with the Bayesian networks<br />

for simultaneous estimation of gene networks <strong>and</strong> transcription factor binding<br />

sites. Nariai et al. (31,32) used protein–protein interaction data for refining gene<br />

networks estimated from microarray data. Tamada et al. (33) used evolutionary<br />

information to estimate gene networks of two distinct organisms.<br />

9. The dynamic Bayesian networks (34–36) can estimate gene networks with cyclic<br />

relations from time-course microarray data. Also, Yoshida et al. (37) proposed a<br />

dynamic linear model with Markov switching to estimate time-dependent gene<br />

networks that can allow structural change of the estimated gene network depending<br />

on time.<br />

10. For measuring reliability of an estimated edge, the bootstrap (38) is a useful<br />

method. As an advanced method of the bootstrap method, Kamimura et al. (39)<br />

used the multiscale bootstrap method (40) for computing more acculate bootstrap<br />

probability for the estimated edge in the Bayesian network.<br />

11. Belief propagation (41) is an algorithm to infer the posterior marginal probability<br />

of a variable in the Bayesian networks. The exact computation of this algorithm is<br />

limited for singly connected networks; however, it takes only linear time in practice.<br />

Generally, calculating the probability in an arbitrary Bayesian network is<br />

known to be NP-hard (42). Therefore, several approximation algorithms have been<br />

proposed such as the loopy belief propagation (41), the junction tree algorithm<br />

(43), <strong>and</strong> sampling based methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (44).<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We thank our colleagues <strong>and</strong> collaborators Hideo Bannai, Michiel de Hoon,<br />

Ryo Yoshida, Takao Goto, Sunyong Kim, Naoki Nariai, Sascha Ott, Tomoyuki<br />

Higuchi, Hidetoshi Shimodaira, Sachiyo Aburatani, Kousuke Tashiro, <strong>and</strong><br />

Satoru Kuhara.<br />

References<br />

1. Akutsu, T., Kuhara, S., Maruyama, O., <strong>and</strong> Miyano, S. (1998) A system for identifying<br />

genetic networks from gene expression patterns produced by gene disruptions<br />

<strong>and</strong> overexpressions. Genome Inform. 9, 151–160.<br />

2. Akutsu, T., Miyano, S., <strong>and</strong> Kuhara, S. (1999) Identification of genetic networks<br />

from a small number of gene expression patterns under the Boolean network<br />

model. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 4, 17–28.<br />

3. Shmulevich, I., Dougherty, E. R., Kim, S., <strong>and</strong> Zhang, W. (2002) Probabilistic<br />

Boolean networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks.<br />

Bioinformatics 18, 261–274.<br />

4. Chen, T., He, H. L., <strong>and</strong> Church, G. M. (1999) Modeling gene expression with<br />

differential equations. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 4, 29–40.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!