02.03.2013 Views

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118 Røsok <strong>and</strong> Sioud<br />

Compared with subtraction cloning, positive selection can be more efficient for<br />

isolating differentially expressed transcripts because subtractive hybridization<br />

rarely goes to completion. Therefore, a background of common unsubtracted<br />

clones may persist. In contrast, because tester concentration is low, the desired<br />

tester–tester duplexes take longer to form than driver–driver duplexes. Thus, rare<br />

clones that have not reannealed are likely to be missed in positive selection. A<br />

solution to this problem is to use reagents, which decreases the aqueous volume,<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus increases the hybridization rate. Polyethylene glycol <strong>and</strong> phenol may<br />

serve this purpose (13). Using a normalized tester population also makes positive<br />

selection more effective. The positive selection may be done without including a<br />

PCR step. More recent methods include PCR, which is done in representational<br />

difference analysis (RDA) <strong>and</strong> in subtractive suppression hybridization (SSH).<br />

1.1.5. Representational Difference Analysis (RDA)<br />

In RDA, target cDNA fragments from one of two cell populations are<br />

sequentially enriched by favorable hybridization kinetics <strong>and</strong> subsequently<br />

amplified by PCR, whereas material common to both populations is eliminated<br />

by selective degradation (14).<br />

RDA, originally developed as a method for isolation of differences between<br />

two complex genomes (15), has further been developed to cDNA RDA. This technique<br />

is a PCR-based subtractive hybridization technique for identifying differentially<br />

expressed genes. The mRNA from both populations is isolated <strong>and</strong> converted<br />

into dscDNA. By cutting this cDNA with a four-base pair (bp) restriction enzyme,<br />

a large proportion of the transcripts will be represented as amplifiable fragments<br />

(150 bp–1.2 kilobases [kb]) (16). Amplified fragments, known as “representations,”<br />

are hybridized at high driver:tester ratio. By using a combination of<br />

linker ligation, restriction cutting, <strong>and</strong> PCR, exponential amplification of only<br />

tester–tester hybrids is achieved. Single-str<strong>and</strong>ed DNA is enzymatically degraded.<br />

To amplify only true differences, a second <strong>and</strong> often a third round of subtraction<br />

is performed, in which the ratio of driver to tester is increased. Difference<br />

products are visible in agarose gels <strong>and</strong> can easily be subcloned. Transcripts<br />

expressed in less than one copy per cell can be detected with low rate of false<br />

positives (14). In circumstances where many differences are expected, RDA<br />

enriches the products that amplify most effectively, <strong>and</strong> not necessarily all the<br />

interesting differences. Thus, RDA is not the method of choice when investigating<br />

tissues with abundant differences (14). Because no normalization step is<br />

included, the method is not efficient for the detection of rare transcripts.<br />

1.1.6. Suppression Subtractive Hybridization (SSH)<br />

In SSH, normalization <strong>and</strong> subtraction are combined in a single step to<br />

equalize the abundance of cDNA within the target population <strong>and</strong> to exclude the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!