02.03.2013 Views

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gene <strong>Target</strong> <strong>Discovery</strong> 117<br />

In the first protocols describing subtraction cloning, double-str<strong>and</strong>ed (ds)<br />

driver–tester was removed by hydroxyapatite (HAP) column chromatography,<br />

<strong>and</strong> single-str<strong>and</strong>ed driver mRNA was removed by RNase or alkali degradation<br />

(5–7). HAP binds double-str<strong>and</strong>ed molecules more tightly than single-str<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

molecules, enabling separation of driver–tester <strong>and</strong> driver–driver duplexes from<br />

unhybridized tester. Because this method is cumbersome, alternative techniques<br />

for removing driver <strong>and</strong> tester duplexes have been developed, <strong>and</strong> they involve<br />

both methods for physical removal, enzymatic degradation, immobilization,<br />

<strong>and</strong> chemical cross-linking (reviewed in ref. 8).<br />

1.1.3. PCR-Based Subtraction Cloning<br />

Using polyA+ mRNA as the driver is possible only when one is able to<br />

obtain large amounts of starting material <strong>and</strong> when the biological sources to be<br />

compared are closely related. When material is limited, or the tissue is complex,<br />

amplification must be performed before subtraction. Multiple rounds of subtraction<br />

also may require amplification of the resulting population of tester. A<br />

drawback is that the representation of individual transcripts may be altered during<br />

multiple rounds of amplification. The transcript from both driver <strong>and</strong> tester<br />

may be amplified from cDNA libraries, by in vitro transcription, or by PCR.<br />

Single-str<strong>and</strong>ed driver is more efficient than double-str<strong>and</strong>ed driver because of<br />

competition between driver–driver duplex formation <strong>and</strong> the desired driver–tester<br />

duplex formation. This competition necessitates more rounds of subtraction to<br />

ensure optimal subtraction. Amplified single-str<strong>and</strong>ed driver may be obtained<br />

from libraries as single-str<strong>and</strong>ed phagemids (9), by in vitro transcription with T3<br />

or T7 RNA polymerase (10), or by asymmetric PCR on single-str<strong>and</strong>ed template<br />

(11). However, subtraction performed using double-str<strong>and</strong>ed driver also can be<br />

effective (12).<br />

1.1.4. Positive Selection<br />

In positive selection, nucleic acids representing genes uniquely or predominantly<br />

expressed in one source of biological material compared with another<br />

are selected <strong>and</strong> isolated. Undesired nucleic acids representing genes expressed<br />

in both sources are left behind.<br />

For subtraction cloning, nucleic acids from the interesting material (tester)<br />

are hybridized with nucleic acids from the compared material (driver). In<br />

contrast to subtraction cloning, double-str<strong>and</strong>ed nucleic acids are used both<br />

for driver <strong>and</strong> tester. The principle is to isolate tester–tester duplexes, representing<br />

genes uniquely expressed in the material of interest. Tester–driver <strong>and</strong><br />

driver–driver duplexes as well as unhybridized driver <strong>and</strong> tester are left behind.<br />

No physical separation of single-str<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> double-str<strong>and</strong>ed nucleic acids<br />

is included.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!