01.03.2013 Views

Thermal Analysis of a H1616 Shipping Container - prod.sandia.gov ...

Thermal Analysis of a H1616 Shipping Container - prod.sandia.gov ...

Thermal Analysis of a H1616 Shipping Container - prod.sandia.gov ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 7. Final Model Parameters determined through Calibration.<br />

C6 <strong>Thermal</strong> Test C9 <strong>Thermal</strong> Test<br />

Foam Fire Start (ts) 20 minutes 30 minutes<br />

Foam Fire End (te) 40 minutes 50 minutes<br />

Foam Fire Factor (χ) 0 .14 0.32<br />

Heat Transfer Coefficient (hb) 5.5 W/m 2 ◦ K 7.0 W/m 2◦ K<br />

Emissivity (% <strong>of</strong> tabulated ) (ɛ) 0.20 0.20<br />

Cooling Air Temp 40 ◦ F 40 ◦ F<br />

Table 8. System Properties Predicted from <strong>Thermal</strong> Calibration Tests.<br />

C6 Test C9 Test<br />

Foam Fire Duration 20 minutes 20 minutes<br />

Foam Fire Heat Generation 117,628 W/m 3 260,460 W/m 3<br />

Max. Flange Temp. ( Predicted) 345.0 ◦ F 465.7 ◦ F<br />

Max. Flange Temp. ( Experimental) 344.7 ◦ F 465.0 ◦ F<br />

thermal experiments is seen in fire factor, χ. The fire factor determined in the C9 thermal<br />

test is 0.32, a value larger than the value <strong>of</strong> 0.14 determined in the C6 thermal test. This<br />

implies that the foam released more energy in the C9 test which may be a consequence <strong>of</strong><br />

the higher temperature reached by the polyurethane foam layer due to the higher shroud<br />

temperature.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!