01.03.2013 Views

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

production: 1944 compared with 2007.” Journal of Animal Science 87, no. 6: 2160-2167. Academic Search<br />

Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed Jan. 25, 2011).<br />

59. Due to rounding errors, the calculations for post-farmgate emissions vary slightly from the post-farmgate<br />

emissions in the Calculation for Total Overall Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cheese Production and<br />

Consumption.<br />

60. Due to rounding errors, the calculations for post-farmgate emissions vary slightly from the post-farmgate<br />

emissions in the Calculation for Total Overall Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Egg Production and Consumption<br />

61. Input data (not emission values) were based on the inputs reported in: N. Pelletier, et al, “Not All Salmon<br />

Are Created Equal: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Global Salmon Farming Systems”, Environ. Sci. Technol.<br />

2009 43, 8730–8736; and Filleting and freezing of fish: LCA Food Database (http://www.lcafood.dk/<br />

processes/industry/filletingfish.htm)<br />

62. Due to rounding errors, the calculations for post-farmgate emissions vary slightly from the post-farmgate<br />

emissions in the Calculation for Total Overall Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Salmon Production and<br />

Consumption<br />

63. Input data is provided by: A. Hospido, et al, “Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries”,<br />

Fisheries Research (76) 2005.<br />

64. Personal communication with Rich Pirog, co-author of “Comparative Life Cycle <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts of<br />

Three Beef Production Strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States,” Agricultural Systems 103, 2010.<br />

65. Production Data is from: “Comparative Life Cycle <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts of Three Beef Production Strategies<br />

in the Upper Midwestern United States,” Agricultural Systems 103, 2010.<br />

66. USDA average inputs from S. Kim and B. Dale, “Cumulative Energy and Global Warming Impact from the<br />

Production of Biomass for Biobased Products”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Volume 7, Number 3–4, 2004.<br />

67. *Weighted by area harvested in each state (AR, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, NC, ND,<br />

OH, SD, TN, VA, WI) Source: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), 2005; USDA, Economic<br />

Research Service (ERS) (a); USDA, ERS (b); and USDA, NASS, 2003.<br />

68. See blog post- on this topic: Modeling soil nitrous oxide emissions for legumes<br />

69. Yang and Cai, “The effect of growing soybean (Glycine max. L.) on N2O emission from soil” Soil Biology &<br />

Biochemistry 37 (2005) 1205–1209; Ciampitti and Ciarlo, “Nitrous oxide emissions from soil during soybean<br />

(Glycine max (L.) Merrill] crop phenological stages and stubbles decomposition period”, Biol Fertil Soils<br />

(2008) 44:581–588.<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!