01.03.2013 Views

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

By: Kari Hamerschlag, EWG Senior Analyst<br />

Kumar Venkat, President & Chief Technologist, CleanMetrics Corp.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> (EWG) partnered with CleanMetrics Corp., a Portland, Ore.-based environmental<br />

analysis and consulting firm, to carry out “cradle to grave” life cycle assessments (LCAs)<br />

of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for selected protein-rich foods, from production of animal feed to<br />

the food waste thrown in the trash.<br />

The LCAs calculate GHG emissions from each major process, from the production and application of<br />

fertilizers, pesticides and other materials used to grow crops through to the processing, transportation<br />

and disposal of unused food at the retail, institutional and household level. 1 The LCA also accounts<br />

for waste from the portion of the animal carcass that is not available for consumption.<br />

This document provides a detailed report on the methodology, assumptions and results of the<br />

lifecycle assessments of 20 plant and animal foods commonly consumed in the United States. Due<br />

to lack of data, the analysis focused on typical, conventional food production systems rather than<br />

organic production systems or those based on best management agricultural practices that might<br />

result in lower emissions. While our LCAs focus exclusively on GHG emissions, climate impact is<br />

just one of many critical environmental and health factors to consider in evaluating protein choices.<br />

The <strong>Meat</strong> Eater’s <strong>Guide</strong> to Climate Change and Health provides a broad overview of the health and<br />

environmental concerns linked to animal production.<br />

Section 1 addresses the boundaries (key elements included and excluded) of the LCA, the main<br />

production inputs and emission outputs, sources of data and the assumptions related to each of the<br />

main stages of production and consumption. We also provide a detailed explanation of the validation<br />

process, including a chart comparing our findings to other comparable and mostly peer-reviewed or<br />

government-sponsored LCA studies of that product. We describe many of the underlying uncertainties<br />

and variability associated with estimating GHG emissions from food production and provide concrete<br />

examples of how emissions can be reduced by better management practices. Section 2 describes the<br />

essential production, consumption and modeling details and emissions of each production system as<br />

well as the results of the GHG calculations for each based on the available input data.<br />

A. LCA Boundaries and Functional Unit<br />

The functional unit used to calculate GHG emissions 2 is 1 kilogram of consumed, edible product. This<br />

differs considerably from the current set of published LCAs, which typically calculate only the GHGs<br />

associated with the production of one unit of edible meat or live carcass. Our model goes further to<br />

consider the GHG’s associated with material and energy expended or produced at each major stage<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!