Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
By: Kari Hamerschlag, EWG Senior Analyst<br />
Kumar Venkat, President & Chief Technologist, CleanMetrics Corp.<br />
Introduction<br />
<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> (EWG) partnered with CleanMetrics Corp., a Portland, Ore.-based environmental<br />
analysis and consulting firm, to carry out “cradle to grave” life cycle assessments (LCAs)<br />
of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for selected protein-rich foods, from production of animal feed to<br />
the food waste thrown in the trash.<br />
The LCAs calculate GHG emissions from each major process, from the production and application of<br />
fertilizers, pesticides and other materials used to grow crops through to the processing, transportation<br />
and disposal of unused food at the retail, institutional and household level. 1 The LCA also accounts<br />
for waste from the portion of the animal carcass that is not available for consumption.<br />
This document provides a detailed report on the methodology, assumptions and results of the<br />
lifecycle assessments of 20 plant and animal foods commonly consumed in the United States. Due<br />
to lack of data, the analysis focused on typical, conventional food production systems rather than<br />
organic production systems or those based on best management agricultural practices that might<br />
result in lower emissions. While our LCAs focus exclusively on GHG emissions, climate impact is<br />
just one of many critical environmental and health factors to consider in evaluating protein choices.<br />
The <strong>Meat</strong> Eater’s <strong>Guide</strong> to Climate Change and Health provides a broad overview of the health and<br />
environmental concerns linked to animal production.<br />
Section 1 addresses the boundaries (key elements included and excluded) of the LCA, the main<br />
production inputs and emission outputs, sources of data and the assumptions related to each of the<br />
main stages of production and consumption. We also provide a detailed explanation of the validation<br />
process, including a chart comparing our findings to other comparable and mostly peer-reviewed or<br />
government-sponsored LCA studies of that product. We describe many of the underlying uncertainties<br />
and variability associated with estimating GHG emissions from food production and provide concrete<br />
examples of how emissions can be reduced by better management practices. Section 2 describes the<br />
essential production, consumption and modeling details and emissions of each production system as<br />
well as the results of the GHG calculations for each based on the available input data.<br />
A. LCA Boundaries and Functional Unit<br />
The functional unit used to calculate GHG emissions 2 is 1 kilogram of consumed, edible product. This<br />
differs considerably from the current set of published LCAs, which typically calculate only the GHGs<br />
associated with the production of one unit of edible meat or live carcass. Our model goes further to<br />
consider the GHG’s associated with material and energy expended or produced at each major stage<br />
<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011 5