01.03.2013 Views

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Crop<br />

Animal<br />

Feed: Corn<br />

Animal<br />

Feed: Soybeans<br />

Animal<br />

Feed: alfalfa/hay<br />

Animal<br />

Feed: Orchard<br />

grass<br />

Rice<br />

Dry Beans<br />

(Average:<br />

.80 CO 2 e)<br />

Table 29. Production System and Primary Input Data for Feedstock and Plant Protein Products<br />

Region/Production<br />

System<br />

kg CO 2 e/ kg at<br />

farmgate (production)<br />

Corn, Iowa Corn: .23<br />

Corn, conventional<br />

(double cropped), for<br />

silage, Iowa<br />

Soybeans, conventional,<br />

USA<br />

Alfalfa, conventional<br />

(mixed irrigation), for<br />

hay, California, USA<br />

Orchard grass, conventional,<br />

for hay,<br />

California, USA<br />

Average of 3 California<br />

rice systems; long term<br />

culture, flooded; rice<br />

only rotation flooded; 2<br />

year crop rotation<br />

Average of 3 bean<br />

production systems:<br />

California blackeye<br />

beans, doublecropped;<br />

California<br />

common dry varieties,<br />

double-cropped ;<br />

and Idaho dry beans,<br />

center-pivot irrigation<br />

Corn silage : .08<br />

Primary Data Source<br />

NASS data from N. Pelletier, et al,<br />

“Comparative life cycle environmental<br />

impacts of three beef production<br />

strategies in the Upper Midwestern<br />

United States”, Agricultural Systems<br />

103, 2010.<br />

Soybean: .59 USDA average inputs from S. Kim<br />

and B. Dale, “Cumulative Energy<br />

and GlobalWarming Impact from the<br />

Soybean meal: .67 Production of Biomass for Biobased<br />

Products”, Journal of Industrial Ecology,<br />

Volume 7, Number 3–4, 2004.<br />

0.13<br />

0.28<br />

(brown)<br />

2.43<br />

(white)<br />

2.64<br />

0.56<br />

1.03<br />

Univ of Calif., Davis, Agricultural Cost<br />

and Return Studies<br />

Univ of Calif., Davis, Agricultural Cost<br />

and Return Studies<br />

Univ of Calif., Davis, Agricultural Cost<br />

and Return Studies<br />

Univ of Calif., Davis, Agricultural Cost<br />

and Return Studies<br />

University of Idaho, College of Agricultural<br />

and Life Sciences, Enterprise<br />

Budgets<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!