01.03.2013 Views

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong><br />

E. Modeling Emissions from Feedstock and Crop Production<br />

Our GHG life cycle analysis of crop production for animal feed (grains and forage crops), beans, vegetables<br />

and nuts was based on one or two representative conventional production systems from one<br />

or two geographic locations. Table below indicates geographic region and primary data source. While<br />

input data varied considerably across crop types, the general assumptions regarding the farm structure<br />

remained the same.<br />

1. General Production and Modeling Details<br />

• The farm receives manufactured inputs – including fertilizers (both synthetic and organic),<br />

pesticides, lime, gypsum, etc. – from sources that are not typically local. Locally procured<br />

inputs included compost and manure.<br />

• Other inputs to the farm include fuel – such as gasoline, diesel, and propane – and electricity<br />

from the local power grid.<br />

• Water for irrigation is required in many but not all crop production systems. Water may come<br />

from various sources, including groundwater, district-supplied water and natural sources such<br />

as rivers. Most irrigation requires energy use, which may be accounted for directly as part of<br />

the on-farm energy use and/or indirectly as the energy used by the water district to supply the<br />

water.<br />

• On-farm emissions are generated by fuel combustion, application of lime and urea to the soil,<br />

application of nitrogen fertilizers to the soil, flooding of rice fields and other factors such as<br />

crop residues left on the ground.<br />

• In the case of nut crops, our analysis accounts for carbon that is absorbed and sequestered in<br />

the biomass of perennial crops, considering the full production life cycle spanning many years<br />

or decades. As explained previously, carbon sequestration benefits and losses due to soil<br />

management practices are not considered in the calculations.<br />

• Some farm operations may include certain food processing steps. For example, the LCA<br />

model includes refrigerated potatoes that are stored on farm; all of these energy-consuming<br />

operations are included in the fuel and electricity requirements for the farm.<br />

2. Specific Modeling Details for Feedstock Production<br />

a. Corn Production<br />

Our LCA calculated GHG emissions for corn and corn silage based on the production input data in<br />

Table 40 (below) for a hectare of Iowa corn production, with an estimated yield of 10.7 metric tons<br />

of corn and 42.2 metric tons of corn silage. The original input data were presented as a supplement<br />

to “Comparative Life Cycle <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts of Three Beef Production Strategies in the Upper<br />

Midwestern United States” and, according to the authors, were initially gathered from several sources<br />

including NASS, ISU extension, and other university sources. 67 In this model, 1 kg of corn and 1 kg of<br />

corn silage generates .23 kg CO 2 e. and .08 CO 2 e respectively.<br />

40<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!