01.03.2013 Views

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong><br />

Calculation for total overall greenhouse gas emissions from beef production and consumption<br />

c. Sources of GHG Emissions from Beef Production<br />

In our analysis, the majority of GHG emissions from beef production come from enteric fermentation<br />

(46 percent) and feed production (28 percent). According to our analysis, the cow-calf and steer calf<br />

stages generate more than 65 percent of the total GHG emissions, with the remaining emissions generated<br />

during confinement. During the cow-calf phase, the cow consumes copious amounts of hay. In<br />

converting the hay, the cow’s body generates much higher methane emissions than with the higher<br />

quality, lower fiber rations of the second and third stages of production. Our estimate is similar to that<br />

of Phetteplace, et al. that 76 percent of farmgate emissions from cattle production are generated during<br />

the first cow-calf stage. 50<br />

The two-stage Idaho production system generated fewer production emissions than the Nebraska<br />

system primarily due to differences in the emissions from feed production. The Idaho cow-calf system<br />

receives the majority of its feed from grazing on federal and state ranges, previously harvested hay<br />

ground and crop aftermath. The comparable stages in the Nebraska system are fed rations consisting<br />

of hay (a large feed component for the cow-calf system) and grains. Both systems produce relatively<br />

high methane from enteric fermentation due to the high-fiber diets. While the Idaho system produces<br />

slightly more methane than the Nebraska system, the latter has higher total emissions since it both<br />

has high enteric fermentation emissions from the high fiber hay as well as high emissions due to the<br />

larger impact of producing the hay and grains.<br />

26<br />

Figure 2. Sources of Beef Production Emissions: A Nebraska System<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!