Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong><br />
For each meat protein, we provide the results of the LCA GHG calculations for each system based on<br />
the available input data. Due to the limitations of the initial scope of work, we are only able to provide<br />
detailed breakdowns of emission sources for four of the modeled production systems: beef, poultry,<br />
cheese and lentils, as well as for the three primary feed inputs: corn, soy and alfalfa. We also provide<br />
details for the post-production emissions for all meat proteins.<br />
Allocation Factor: Since the functional unit in this analysis is 1 kg of consumed, edible product, as<br />
opposed to live carcass weight, our model applies mass-based economic allocation to derive a multiplier<br />
used to estimate the GHGs associated with the edible meat. This accounts for the fact that the entire<br />
animal is not eaten. The multiplier is based on the actual fraction of an animal’s live weight that is available<br />
for consumption (55 percent, in the case of beef) and the relative economic value that is allocated<br />
to the edible product (87.2 percent in the case of beef). 45 The multiplier is then multiplied by the emissions<br />
for 1 kg of live weight in order to calculate the emissions for 1 kg of edible meat. For meats such<br />
as lamb, for which a relatively low fraction of overall carcass is edible, the multiplier will be higher than<br />
for other meats.<br />
Table 3. LCA Allocation Factors<br />
<strong>Meat</strong> Product<br />
22<br />
Edible fraction<br />
of live weight<br />
Relative economic<br />
value of edible<br />
fraction<br />
Multiplier for<br />
mass-weighted<br />
economic<br />
allocation*<br />
<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011<br />
Sources<br />
Chicken 0.56 0.95 1.70 Pelletier (2008) Pelletier<br />
(2006)<br />
Turkey 0.40 0.95 2.38 Fuller<br />
Pelletier<br />
(2006)<br />
Pork 0.65 0.89 1.37 Wirsenius<br />
Beef 0.55 0.84 1.53 A. Barber, et al<br />
Lamb 0.42 0.87 2.08 A. Barber, et al<br />
Oily Fish 0.50 0.91 1.82 LCA Food Database<br />
White Fish 0.45 0.91 2.02 LCA Food Database<br />
*(Multiply emissions for 1 kg of live weight by this number to calculate emissions for 1 kg of edible meat.)<br />
With the exception of seafood produced overseas, the post-farmgate CO 2 e emissions per kg of consumed<br />
product are based on domestic production with an average transport distance of 2,414 Km<br />
(1,500 miles) for the end consumer product (2,253 Km in semi-trailer truck (1,400 miles) and 161 Km<br />
(100 miles) in single-unit truck). 46 Data results are available upon request for emissions based on local<br />
and imported/shipped food products. Cooking assumptions for all products are provided in Annex B.