01.03.2013 Views

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong><br />

An astounding amount of meat – on average about 20 percent – is wasted at the retail, institutional<br />

and consumer level. The GHGs associated with producing and discarding wasted food is calculated<br />

using a recently commissioned USDA study (Muth, et al 2011) of consumer-level food loss estimates<br />

at the retail and household levels, and other literature sources for estimates of fat loss (included in<br />

USDA data) and moisture loss (not included in USDA data) during cooking.<br />

USDA states that these data are more accurate than previously published USDA data, but they are<br />

still likely underestimating actual waste. 29 At least two other major studies have generated higher retail<br />

and consumer waste estimates. 30 Given data limitations, our model considers only the waste from<br />

the retail and consumer phases (including institutions and restaurants) for each food commodity. Our<br />

calculations do not include wasted product that remains on farmers’ fields or waste generated from<br />

processing. In the absence of solid data, our model conjectures that half of the consumer waste (excluding<br />

fat and moisture losses) occurs prior to cooking and the other half occurs after cooking. The<br />

overall model also accounts for fat and moisture losses during cooking, as well as waste that occurs<br />

prior to cooking – including retail waste and non-edible share (such as egg shells or broccoli stems).<br />

For meat products, only the edible share is included in the model based on co-product allocation at<br />

the production stage.<br />

Based on that waste percentage, we calculate the GHGs associated with the amount of a given product<br />

that is needed to produce 1 kg of consumed product. In other words, if the production is P kg, and<br />

the waste percentage is W percent, then: P = 1/(1-(W/100)).<br />

Here is how our model works in the case of beef. Recent USDA research shows that 23.44 percent of<br />

the weight of packaged beef is never used, is wasted during cooking or discarded after a meal. 31 This<br />

includes a retail loss of 4.3 percent and further losses at the consumer level. Relative to the consumer<br />

loss portion, available data suggests that 7 percent is fat loss that occurs during cooking and is<br />

included in the USDA waste data. An additional 18 percent of weight loss (relative to product available<br />

after other losses) occurs during cooking from moisture loss, which we assume is not included in the<br />

USDA waste data – this requires production and waste to be scaled up appropriately to deliver 1 kg of<br />

cooked product for consumption. We therefore calculate that it takes 1.59 kg of beef to produce 1 kg<br />

of consumed meat, and 0.59 kg is lost during the retail and consumption phase. 32 Actual waste that<br />

is disposed through landfilling or composting amounts to 0.27 kg, the balance being the fat and moisture<br />

losses during cooking.<br />

All food waste sent to landfills is modeled using the same IPCC first-order model 33 and decay rate<br />

for the food category (for example, all meat is assumed to decay at the same rate, with no difference<br />

between chicken and lamb). The only difference between various food commodities is the estimated<br />

percentage of food waste. We assumed that the landfill was located in a temperate dry zone. (A<br />

temperate wet zone has slightly higher emissions). The food waste that ends up in landfills generates<br />

methane emissions from anaerobic decomposition as well as a small amount of nitrous oxide emissions.<br />

Our model assumes that 23.25 percent of the landfill methane is captured on average (with<br />

credit given for energy recovery) and 21 percent of the methane is flared (EPA2006), and some credit<br />

is given for carbon storage in the landfill. The analysis also calculates emissions from the transport of<br />

16<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!