01.03.2013 Views

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong><br />

as crops, animals, soil, etc.) within a bounded geographical area and specified time frame that takes<br />

external inputs (such as fertilizers, water, energy, etc.) and produces useful outputs (such as grains,<br />

vegetables, meat, etc.) using specific production methods. Due to limited available data, only one production<br />

method was considered for a few items, including chicken, peanut butter, lentils and orchard<br />

grass.<br />

We selected specific conventional production systems to model based primarily on a) the availability<br />

of input data, and b) how representative it is of the industry as a whole.<br />

We made a concerted effort to find publicly available production data from leading production regions<br />

for major meat categories. These public data sources are typically university agricultural extension<br />

programs, university agro-economics departments and state- or province-level departments of agriculture.<br />

These sources often provide data in the form of cost and return studies or budgets that include<br />

all the specific inputs consumed by a typical production system and outputs generated by the<br />

system in a specified region. We judged the quality of the data based on a number of criteria, including<br />

completeness and consistency with other data sources. We rejected some data sources that did<br />

not meet these standards (in some cases, after running a trial analysis to further evaluate the data<br />

quality).<br />

Data was not always available for states that produce the most of some types of meat. Generally,<br />

however, we were able to find good production data from one of the top three production states for<br />

major categories such as beef and pork, as well as for dairy and eggs. We supplemented these primary<br />

sources with data from other regions. The two poultry meats, chicken and turkey, are the exception<br />

to this. The broiler chicken production data is from a large-scale confined feeding operation in<br />

British Columbia, Canada 11 and the turkey calculations are based on data from Pennsylvania.<br />

The data models in this analysis were based on typical production systems, rather than best-management<br />

agricultural practices that might result in lower emissions. Because of differences in inputs,<br />

management practices and consumption patterns, there is some variability in the exact GHG emission<br />

results for a given product. In Section 4c, we discuss how emissions might change with better<br />

management practices.<br />

3. Data Sources for Calculating Emissions from Each Stage of Production<br />

Using basic emission factors, equations and calculations from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate<br />

Change (IPCC), the U.S. <strong>Environmental</strong> Protection Agency (EPA) and other recognized sources<br />

described below, CleanMetrics analyzed each aspect of the input data to calculate the GHGs associated<br />

with each activity along the supply chain.<br />

The analysis used emission factors and calculations for the extraction and combustion of primary<br />

fuels – as well as non-energy-related factors for GHG emissions inherent in industrial, agricultural,<br />

transport and other processes – generated primarily from the following two sources:<br />

10<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!