Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
Meat Eaters Guide: Methodology - Environmental Working Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong><br />
as crops, animals, soil, etc.) within a bounded geographical area and specified time frame that takes<br />
external inputs (such as fertilizers, water, energy, etc.) and produces useful outputs (such as grains,<br />
vegetables, meat, etc.) using specific production methods. Due to limited available data, only one production<br />
method was considered for a few items, including chicken, peanut butter, lentils and orchard<br />
grass.<br />
We selected specific conventional production systems to model based primarily on a) the availability<br />
of input data, and b) how representative it is of the industry as a whole.<br />
We made a concerted effort to find publicly available production data from leading production regions<br />
for major meat categories. These public data sources are typically university agricultural extension<br />
programs, university agro-economics departments and state- or province-level departments of agriculture.<br />
These sources often provide data in the form of cost and return studies or budgets that include<br />
all the specific inputs consumed by a typical production system and outputs generated by the<br />
system in a specified region. We judged the quality of the data based on a number of criteria, including<br />
completeness and consistency with other data sources. We rejected some data sources that did<br />
not meet these standards (in some cases, after running a trial analysis to further evaluate the data<br />
quality).<br />
Data was not always available for states that produce the most of some types of meat. Generally,<br />
however, we were able to find good production data from one of the top three production states for<br />
major categories such as beef and pork, as well as for dairy and eggs. We supplemented these primary<br />
sources with data from other regions. The two poultry meats, chicken and turkey, are the exception<br />
to this. The broiler chicken production data is from a large-scale confined feeding operation in<br />
British Columbia, Canada 11 and the turkey calculations are based on data from Pennsylvania.<br />
The data models in this analysis were based on typical production systems, rather than best-management<br />
agricultural practices that might result in lower emissions. Because of differences in inputs,<br />
management practices and consumption patterns, there is some variability in the exact GHG emission<br />
results for a given product. In Section 4c, we discuss how emissions might change with better<br />
management practices.<br />
3. Data Sources for Calculating Emissions from Each Stage of Production<br />
Using basic emission factors, equations and calculations from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate<br />
Change (IPCC), the U.S. <strong>Environmental</strong> Protection Agency (EPA) and other recognized sources<br />
described below, CleanMetrics analyzed each aspect of the input data to calculate the GHGs associated<br />
with each activity along the supply chain.<br />
The analysis used emission factors and calculations for the extraction and combustion of primary<br />
fuels – as well as non-energy-related factors for GHG emissions inherent in industrial, agricultural,<br />
transport and other processes – generated primarily from the following two sources:<br />
10<br />
<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Meat</strong> <strong>Eaters</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>: <strong>Methodology</strong> 2011